Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
GINAB. 1,
Plaintiff,
V.
COMMISSIONER,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:25-cv-18
Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston
Deavers
DECISIONAND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORTAND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(DOC. #12); STATEMENT OF ERRORS OF PLAINTIFF GINA B. (DOC.
#12) IS SUSTAINED; THE DECISION OF DEFENDANT
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, THAT
PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED, AND THEREFORE NOT ENTITLED
TO BENEFITS, UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT IS REVERSED
AS UNSUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE; THE CASE IS
REMANDEDPURSUANT TO SENTENCEFOUR OF 42 U. S. C. §
405(g) TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS;
TERMINATION ENTRY
Plaintiff Gina B. seeks review by this Court of the decision by the
Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") of the Defendant Commissioner, Social
Security Administration, that there is a significant number of jobs in the national
economy that Plaintiff is able to perform past relevant work and, therefore, is not
1 "The Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of
the United States has recommended that, due to significant privacy concerns in social security
cases, federal courts should refer to claimants only by their first names and last initials. " GEN.
ORDER 22-01.
Case: 3:25-cv-00018-WHR-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/22/25 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>

disabled under Sections 216 and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. § 301 et
seq. ("Act"). (Admin. Record, Doc. #16-2, p. 39, citing 42 U. S. C. §§ 416(i), 423(d)).
On December 3, 2025, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers filed a
Report and Recommendations (Report, Doc. #12), recommending that Plaintiff's
Statement of Specific Errors (Doc. #8) be sustained, and that pursuant to Sentence
Four of 42 U. S. C. § 405(g), that the Commissioner's decision be reversed as
unsupported by substantial evidence, and that the matter be remanded to the
Commissioner for further proceedings. (Doc. #12, PAGEID 1414). The
Commissioner did not object to the Report, and the time for doing so has expired.
(Id. at PAGEID 1414-15, citing FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2)).
Based upon reasoning and citations of authority set forth in the Report, a de
novo review of this Court's file, including the Administrative Record (Doc. #16),
and a review of the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendations. The Court, in so doing, reverses the Commissioner's finding
of non-disability, and remands the matter to the Commissioner for further
proceedings. Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff and against the
Commissioner.
The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records
of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western
Division, at Dayton.
Case: 3:25-cv-00018-WHR-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/22/25 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>

IT IS SO ORDERED
Date: December 22, 2025 U CN?a3VJi3- ^ , 	\"
WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 3:25-cv-00018-WHR-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/22/25 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>