USA v. Petty et al

3:25-cr-00074Ohsd15 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Case No. : 3:25CR74TMR
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
TYRONE PETTY ET AIi. ,
Defendant.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1),
for good cause shown, the Court hereby grants the unopposed
motion of the United States for entry of a Protective Order,
prescribing the manner in which Defendants and Defendants'
counsel (namely Anthony VanNoy, Jacob Seidl, L. Patrick
Mulligan, John Pinard, and James Fleisher) must handle certain
materials that will be produced to them in discovery - namely,
documents, recording and other materials that containing
personal identifying information of individuals and informants
(collectively, "the Discovery Materials") - as follows:
1. Defendants and Defendants' counsel will not disclose
the information contained in the Discovery Materials directly or
indirectly to any person except: attorneys or investigators who
are assisting in defense; individuals who the defense interviews
as potential witnesses; and potential experts ("Authorized
Individuals"). Upon disclosing information contained in the
Discovery Materials to an Authorized Individual, Defendants and
Case: 3:25-cr-00074-TMR Doc #: 45 Filed: 01/15/26 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Defendants' counsel must provide the Authorized Individual with
a copy of the Court's Protective Order and advise the Authorized
Individual that he or she will be subject to the same
obligations as imposed upon Defendants' counsel by the
Protective Order.
2. Defendants and Defendants' counsel may use the
Discovery Materials solely in the defense of this case and for
no other purpose.
3. At the conclusion of this case. Defendants shall
return the Discovery Materials and copies, reproductions., or
mirror images thereof to Defendants' counsel.
4. . Defendants' counsel shall inform his client of
. these prescriptions placed on the Discovery Materials, and
direct his client not to disclose or use any information
contained in the Discovery Materials in violation of the
Protective Order. However, nothing contained in the Protective
Order will preclude any party from applying to the Court for
further relief or for modification of any provision hereof.
5. Any motion to file a document subject to this
Order under seal must meet the Sixth Circuit's standard set
forth in Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich. ,
825 F. 3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016)
Case: 3:25-cr-00074-TMR Doc #: 45 Filed: 01/15/26 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>
t f<^
DATE HON RABL 0 M. ROSE
UN TED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case: 3:25-cr-00074-TMR Doc #: 45 Filed: 01/15/26 Page: 3 of 3 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.