3:24-cv-00192•Leigh v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BRANDON W. LEIGH Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:24-cv-192 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. NO. 28); TERMINATING ACTION This case is currently before the Court on the Report and Recommendations (“Report”) (Doc. No. 28) issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Deavers recommends that Petitioner Brandon W. Leigh’s (“Leigh”) petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. Nos. 1-1 & 19) be denied with prejudice. (Doc. No. 28 at PageID 1802-03.) As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Noting that no objections to Magistrate Judge Deavers’ Report have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 28). It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Leigh’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. Nos. 1-1 & 19) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. The Court finds that Leigh has not stated a viable claim or presented an issue deserving of appellate review. Therefore, the Court DENIES Leigh a certificate of appealability regarding this Order; Case: 3:24-cv-00192-TMR-EPD Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 3. The Court finds that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, the Court DENIES Leigh leave to appeal this Order in forma pauperis; and, 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to TERMINATE this matter on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Thursday, January 8, 2026. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 3:24-cv-00192-TMR-EPD Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.