USA v. Garnett et al

3:24-cr-00045Ohsd17 mars 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:24-cr-45(3)
vs.
MARVIOUS HESTER, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT MARVIOUS HESTER’S ORAL, UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO REMOVE LOCATION MONITORING; AND (2) CONFIRMING
DEFENDANT REMAINS UNDER ALL PREVIOUSLY-SET CONDITIONS OF
RELEASE (Doc. No. 100) UNTIL HIS VOLUNTARY SURRENDER
______________________________________________________________________________
On March 12, 2026, at Defendant’s sentencing hearing, Defendant made an oral,
unopposed motion to remove his location monitoring until his voluntary surrender. 	The Court
heard from counsel for both sides and United States Pretrial Services Officer John McCabe. There
being no opposition to the request, and for good cause shown, Defendant’s unopposed motion to
remove location monitoring is GRANTED. 	All previously-set conditions of release (Doc. No.
100) are UNCHANGED and remain in full force and effect until his voluntary surrender.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 17, 2026 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:24-cr-00045-MJN Doc #: 268 Filed: 03/17/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.