Mayhan v. Balzer et al

2:25-cv-00522Ohsd2 févr. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BRANDON L. MAYHAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY BALZER, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 2:25-cv-522
District Judge Douglas R. Cole
Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
ORDER
This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Brandon L. Mayhan’s Motion for Extension of
Time. (Doc. #24). Plaintiff requests a 45-day extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss. Id.
For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #24) is hereby
GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17) is
due on or before March 12, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 2, 2026 	s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 2:25-cv-00522-DRC-PBS Doc #: 25 Filed: 02/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.