Randolph v. Bath & Body Works, Inc. et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
DEVIN RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 2:25-cv-284
Judge Michael H. Watson
v. 	Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
BATH & BODY WORKS, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
By Opinion and Orders dated November 17, 2025, the Court ordered the filing of
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and completed its screening of that Amended Complaint,
allowing Plaintiff’s ADA retaliation claim against Bath & Body Works, Inc. (“Bath & Body
Works”) to proceed. (ECF Nos. 41-43.) 	Bath & Body Works previously was served with a
copy of Plaintiff’s initial Complaint and counsel has entered an appearance on its behalf. (ECF
Nos. 6, 14, 20, 27, 28.) Accordingly, the Undersigned deems service of the Amended Complaint
on Bath & Body Works to have been completed upon the filing of the Amended Complaint on
the Court’s docket. Bath & Body Works shall move or plead in response to the Amended
Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Bath & Body Works may
have until DECEMBER 9, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s remaining motions, ECF Nos. 36, 38.
The default briefing schedule (fourteen days) shall apply should Plaintiff wish to file a reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: November 18, 2025 	/s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers_________
ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 2:25-cv-00284-MHW-SCS Doc #: 44 Filed: 11/18/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>