1:26-cv-00064•Hurt v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (CINCINNATI) DYLAN HURT, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION. Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:26-cv-64 District Judge Susan J. Dlott Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry ORDER This is an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner seeks release from confinement imposed as part of the judgment of a state court in a criminal action. The case has been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and General Order 22-05. Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, has paid the filing fee to commence this action. Upon preliminary consideration pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, the Court finds that it does not plainly appear from the face of the Petition and any exhibits attached thereto that Petitioner is not entitled to relief in this Court. Accordingly, Respondent is ORDERED to file an Answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases WITHIN SIXTY DAYS of the date of filing of this Order. Specifically, said Answer must respond to each of Petitioner’s allegations, raise any affirmative defenses, and state whether, from Respondent’s perspective, any claim in the Petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non-retroactivity, or a statute of limitations. Case: 1:26-cv-00064-SJD-MRM Doc #: 5 Filed: 02/17/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 Before filing the Answer, Respondent must file those portions of the state-court record needed to adjudicate this case. When the record is filed electronically, the Court’s CM/ECF filing system will affix a unique PageID number to each page of the record, displayed in the upper right- hand corner of the page. All papers filed in the case thereafter by either party must include record references to the PageID number. Prior to filing the state-court record, Respondent must ensure that any borders on parts of the record (typically, court reporter transcripts) do not obscure the PageID number when the page is filed. In addition, the record must be indexed by insertion of “bookmarks” in the .pdf version of the state-court record uploaded to the Court’s CM/ECF system that display each exhibit and the name of that exhibit in the record. As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, a complete copy of the Answer and state- court record with the PageID numbers must be served on Petitioner at the time of filing. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one (21) days after the Answer is filed, file and serve a reply to the Answer. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve the Petition on Respondent and the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section c/o Brian.Higgins@OhioAGO.gov and Habeas.docketclerk@OhioAGO.gov. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 17, 2026 /s/ Caroline H. Gentry CAROLINE H. GENTRY United States Magistrate Judge Case: 1:26-cv-00064-SJD-MRM Doc #: 5 Filed: 02/17/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.