4:25-cv-01683•Lassiter v. State of Ohio
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOEL LASSITER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:25-cv-1683 Judge J. Philip Calabrese Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong OPINION AND ORDER The Court has now considered the case of Plaintiff Joel Lassiter two times. First, when it dismissed his lawsuit against the State of Ohio, and again when he sought reconsideration. Plaintiff again seeks reconsideration. Upon review of Mr. Lassiter’s motion, it presents no arguments, facts, or developments that justify a different conclusion—either in dismissing his lawsuit or on reconsideration. Therefore, the Court DENIES this motion for reconsideration. The Court advises Plaintiff that if he persists in making frivolous filings, the Court will restrict his ability to file papers in the Northern District of Ohio. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2025 J. Philip Calabrese United States District Judge Northern District of Ohio Case: 4:25-cv-01683-JPC Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/18/25 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.