Stafford et al v. Singh et al

3:25-cv-01456Ohnd17 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Jaylen Stafford, et al., 	Case No. 3:25-cv-1456
Plaintiffs,
v. 	ORDER
Sukhjinder Singh, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in this case on July 11, 2025. (Doc. No. 1). Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m) provides:
If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on
motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without
prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified
time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the
time for service for an appropriate period.
More than ninety days have elapsed since the filing of the Complaint, and there is no indication on
the docket that Plaintiffs have perfected service on any Defendant in this action.
By December 5, 2025, Plaintiffs shall either show service has been perfected on each
Defendant or show cause for the failure to do so. If Plaintiffs fail to do so with respect to any
Defendant, Plaintiffs’ claims against that Defendant will be dismissed without prejudice under Rule
4(m).
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-01456-JJH Doc #: 3 Filed: 11/17/25 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.