1:23-cv-00581•Murphy v. Black
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ALLEN MURPHY, ) CASE NO.: 1:23-cv-00581 ) Petitioner, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) v. ) ) WARDEN KENNETH BLACK ) ORDER ) ) Respondent. ) This matter came before the Court on Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”) (Doc. 1). This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss the Petition. Doc. 12. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner did not file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition is DISMISSED. Case: 1:23-cv-00581-JRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/15/25 1 of 2. PageID #: <pageID>
2 The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 12, 2025 /s/ Judge John R. Adams Date JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 1:23-cv-00581-JRA Doc #: 13 Filed: 12/15/25 2 of 2. PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.