In Re: Dylan Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_____________________________________________
IN RE: DYLAN JOHNSON,
9:26-pf-2 (BKS)
Respondent.
_____________________________________________
Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Chief U.S. District Judge:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
I. 	INTRODUCTION
Since November 2025, Dylan Johnson (named here as “Respondent”) has filed 100 actions
pro se in the Northern District of New York. Respondent brings each action under 42 U.S.C. §
1983, and alleges constitutional violations in connection with his confinement at Warren County
Correctional Facility, where he is being held as a pretrial detainee. For the reasons that follow,
the Court orders Respondent to show cause why he should not be enjoined from filing any civil
action pro se in this District without prior leave of the Chief Judge or his or her designee.
II. 	BACKGROUND
Between November 20, 2025 and March 27, 2026, Respondent filed 27 actions pro se.
See Appendix A. Ten of these cases name Warren County Correctional Facility as the Defendant,
three name Prime Care Medical Inc. as the Defendant, and the remainder appear to name
individual employees of Warren County Correctional Facility. With few exceptions, the
complaints allege Respondent’s “civil and constitutional rights” are being violated and are
devoid of factual content. See, e.g., Johnson v. Mayday, 9:26-cv-0457 (AMN/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, at
4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); but see Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0258
(GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, at 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 23, 2026) (alleging that Johnson told medical
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 1 of 10

2
“on multiple dates” that he “needed more calories due to me being lighted [sic] and dizzy every
day”).On April 6, 2026, Respondent filed an additional 73 actions pro se, see Appendix B, all of
which: name Warren County, Warren County Jail, or Warren County Correctional Facility as the
Defendant; appear to contain some form of the conclusory allegation that the Defendant is
“violating 1st, 8th and 14th amendments” ; and appear to be devoid of factual content. See, e.g.,
Johnson v. Warren County, 9:26-cv-0575 (LEK/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026).
As Respondent is a pretrial detainee and has moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”),
Respondent’s complaints are subject to initial review under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A, 1915(e). Of the
seven complaints reviewed to date, one excessive force claim in one complaint has proceeded
beyond initial review, see Johnson v. Thomas, 9:25-cv-1627 (BKS/DJS), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y.
Dec. 23, 2025) (allowing excessive force claim to proceed but dismissing remaining claims
without prejudice), five complaints have been dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a
claim, see Johnson v. Waite, 9:26-cv-0119 (AJB/PJE), Dkt. No. 8 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2026),
Johnson v. Millis, 9:26-cv-0255 (MAD/DJS), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2026), Johnson v.
Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0258 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026),
Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0296 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4
(N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2026), Johnson v. Linsey, 9:26-cv-0330 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y.
Mar. 31, 2026), and one complaint has been dismissed with prejudice as duplicative, see Johnson
v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0295 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 5 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2026).
III. 	DISCUSSION
A. 	Relevant Law
It is well settled that “[a] district court may, in its discretion, impose sanctions against
litigants who abuse the judicial process.” Shafii v. British Airways, PLC, 83 F.3d 566, 571 (2d
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 2 of 10

3
Cir. 1996). Where a litigant persists in the filing of vexatious and frivolous suits, it may be
appropriate to place certain limitations on the litigant’s future access to the courts. See Hong Mai
Sa v. Doe, 406 F.3d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 2005) (citing Iwachiw v. New York State Dep’t of Motor
Vehicles, 396 F.3d 525, 528 (2d Cir. 2005)); see also Shafii, 83 F.3d at 571 (“The filing of
repetitive and frivolous suits constitutes the type of abuse for which an injunction forbidding
further litigation may be an appropriate sanction.”). The Second Circuit has instructed that courts
must consider the following factors in deciding whether to impose a pre-filing injunction:
(1) the litigant’s history of litigation and in particular whether it
entailed 	vexatious, 	harassing 	or 	duplicative 	lawsuits; 	(2) 	the
litigant’s motive in pursuing the litigation, e.g., does the litigant
have an objective good faith expectation of prevailing?; (3) whether
the litigant is represented by counsel; (4) whether the litigant has
caused 	needless 	expense 	to 	other 	parties 	or 	has 	posed 	an
unnecessary burden on the courts and their personnel; and (5)
whether other sanctions would be adequate to protect the courts and
other parties.
Eliahu v. Jewish Agency for Israel, 919 F.3d 709, 714 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Iwachiw, 396 F.3d
at 528).
B. 	Analysis
While Respondent’s filing history may not be lengthy (he filed his first action in this
District in November 2025), it has been prolific. As noted above, acting pro se, Respondent has
filed 100 lawsuits since November 2025. Few, if any, of Respondent’s complaints contain any
factual allegations and many are duplicative. For example, five of the ten actions Respondent
filed (prior to the 74 actions filed on April 6, 2026) naming Warren County Correctional Facility
as a defendant allege only that the correctional facility is “violating civil and constitutional
rights” and contain no factual content. See Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility,
9:26-cv-0454 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, 4–5 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026) (alleging that
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 3 of 10

4
correctional facility is “violating civil and constitutional rights,” “14th Amendment,” “deliberate
indifferent 8th Amendment,” and “1st Amendment”); Johnson v. Warren County Correctional
Facility, 9:26-cv-0465 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026) (“violating
constitutional rights on multiple occasions”); Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility,
9:26-cv-0466 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026) (“violating civil and
constitutional rights”); Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0467
(BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1, 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026) (“violating civil and constitutional
rights”); Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0468 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1,
4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026) (alleging “violation of civil and constitutional rights”).1 The
three actions Respondent filed against defendant Prime Care Medical Inc., are likewise vague
and duplicative. In Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Group, 9:26-cv-0469 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1,
at 4, Respondent alleges only that Prime Medical Care is “violating civil and constitutional
rights” and provides no factual support. And United States District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
dismissed Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0295 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 5, at 8, with
prejudice, finding it “clearly duplicative,” of Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0258
(GTS/PJE).
The Court is mindful of Respondent’s status as a pro se litigant who does not have the
assistance of counsel and who appears to have had no experience bringing an action in this, or
any other federal court, until recently. However, Respondent has now received at least six
Decisions and Orders from four United States District Court Judges, outlining the requirements
of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, including the requirement that a complaint contain “factual
content, the prohibition against filing duplicative lawsuits, the law applicable to a claim under
1 The above parentheticals contain all factual allegations provided in the respective complaint.
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 4 of 10

5
Section 1983, the necessity of alleging state action and personal involvement. See, e.g., Johnson
v. Thomas, 9:25-cv-1627 (BKS/DJS), Dkt. No. 4, at 4 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2025) (“A claim has
facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the
reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” (quoting Ashcroft v.
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)); Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0295 (GTS/PJE),
Dkt. No. 5, at 6 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2026) (explaining that “‘plaintiffs have no right to maintain
two actions on the same subject in the same court, against the same defendant at the same time.’”
(quoting Curtis v. Citibank, N.A., 226 F.3d 133, 138–39 (2d Cir. 2000)).2 Thus, Respondent
could not have a good faith belief of prevailing when, on April 6, 2026, after receiving these
instructions, he filed dozens of nearly identical complaints alleging municipal liability claims
against Warren County (named variously as Warren County, Warren County Jail, and Warren
County Correctional Facility) under Section 1983, but containing no factual content.3 See, e.g.,
Johnson v. Warren County, 9:26-cv-0552 (LEK/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026)
(“violating 1st Amendment, 8th Amendment, and 14th amendments”); Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-0553 (LEK/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026) (“violating 1st,
8th and 14th amendments”); Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-0554 (LEK/PJE), Dkt. No.
1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026) (“violating 1st, 8th and 14th amendments”); Johnson v. Warren
County, 9:26-cv-0555 (LEK/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026) (alleging “1st, 8th
and 14th Amendment Rights are being violated”).4
2 See also Johnson v. Waite, 9:26-cv-0119 (AJB/PJE), Dkt. No. 8 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2026), Johnson v. Millis, 9:26-
CV-0255 (MAD/DJS), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2026), Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0258
(GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026), Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
0296 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2026), Johnson v. Linsey, 9:26-cv-0330 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 4
(N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2026).
3 Even if Respondent had not received any instruction from the Court, there is no plausible good-faith basis for
simultaneously filing dozens of factually deficient complaints against a single entity.
4 The above parentheticals contain all factual allegations provided in the respective complaint.
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 5 of 10

6
Respondent has yet to cause any expense to other parties as all actions have either been
dismissed or are in very early stages. However, Respondent has caused an inordinate and
unnecessary burden on the Northern District of New York and its personnel in filing multiple
duplicative and vague actions. In all, Respondent has actions pending before six district court
judges and five magistrate judges and the management of those cases has required the extensive
involvement of both Clerk’s Office and Chambers’ staff.
In light of the Respondent’s ongoing filing of numerous, duplicative and vague lawsuits,
even after having been informed of the prohibition against filing duplicative lawsuits and the
requisite pleading standards, the Court finds no sanction other than an order barring Respondent
from filing future actions pro se, without prior approval, would offer defendants or the Court
adequate protection. See Eliahu, 919 F.3d at 715 (noting that although the plaintiffs had the
resources to pay filing fees, “the record demonstrat[ed] that monetary sanctions are unlikely to
dissuade them from continuing their litigation campaign”). Therefore, after carefully reviewing
the record, the Court concludes that, unless Respondent shows cause otherwise, Respondent shall
be enjoined from filing any civil action pro se in this District without prior leave of the Chief
Judge or his or her designee.5 Notwithstanding the overwhelming support for a pre-filing
injunction of this kind, fairness dictates that Respondent be given notice and an opportunity to be
heard. See Iwachiw, 396 F.3d at 529. As a result, Respondent shall have fourteen (14) days from
the date of this Order to show cause, in writing, why he should not be from filing any civil action
pro se in this District without prior leave of the Chief Judge or his or her designee.
IV. 	CONCLUSION
ACCORDINGLY, it is
5 A pre-filing injunction would not apply to previously filed actions.
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 6 of 10

7
ORDERED that Respondent Dylan Johnson shall, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of
the date of this Order, show cause, in writing, why he should not be barred from filing any civil
action pro se without prior leave of the Chief Judge or his or her designee;6 and it is further
ORDERED that, if Respondent does not fully comply with this Order, the Court will
issue a subsequent order, without further explanation, permanently so enjoining Respondent; and
it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Show Cause to Respondent
by regular and certified mail.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2026
6 This injunction would apply to, among other things, continued filings by Respondent as a pro se plaintiff in any
action filed by him in state court removed to this Court or filed by him in another United States District Court and
transferred to this Court. See Sassower v. Starr, 338 B.R. 212, 218-19 & n.1 (S.D.N.Y. Bankr. 2006) (recognizing
validity of pre-filing injunction expressly applying to actions removed from state courts to the Southern District of
New York); Jenkins v. Kerry, 928 F. Supp. 2d 122, 126 (D.D.C. 2013) (noting that Southern District of Florida
would apply its pre-filing injunction to case that was transferred there from the District for the District of
Columbia); Petrols v. Boos, No. 10-cv-0777, 2012 WL 1193982, at *1, n.3, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49785, at *2, n.3
(N.D. W. Va. Apr. 10, 2012) (“This pre-filing injunction does not preclude the plaintiff from filing an action in state
court, but it does apply to cases filed in state court that are removed to this Court.”); Kissi v. Pramco, II, LLC, No.
09-cv-0267, 2009 WL 8636986, at *1, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61425, at *2 (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2009) (applying
District of Maryland’s pre-filing injunction to case that had been transferred from the District of Delaware).
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 7 of 10

8
APPENDIX A
(Cases Filed from November 20, 2025 to March 27, 2026)
(1) Johnson v. Thomas, 9:25-cv-1627 (BKS/DJS), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Nov. 20, 2025);
(2) Johnson v. Waite, 9:26-cv-0119 (AJB/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Jan. 23, 2026); (3)
Johnson v. Millis, 9:26-cv-0255 (MAD/DJS), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 18, 2026); (4)
Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0258 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Feb.
23, 2026); (5) Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Inc., 9:26-cv-0295 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 23, 2026); (6) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
0296 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Feb. 23, 2026); (7) Johnson v. Baller, 9:26-cv-0329
(AJB/DJS), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 2, 2026); (8) Johnson v. Linsey, 9:26-cv-0330
(BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 2, 2026); (9) Johnson v. Warren County
Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0371 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 9, 2026); (10)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-0372 (BKS/DJS), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 9,
2026); (11) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0454 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No.
1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (12) Johnson v. Barton, 9:26-cv-0455 (AJB/CBF), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); (13) Johnson v. Feldieson, 9:26-cv-0456 (AMN/ML), Dkt. No.
1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); (14) Johnson v. Mayday, 9:26-cv-0457 (AMN/PJE), Dkt. No.
1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); (15) Johnson v. Farmer, 9:26-cv-0461 (GTS/DJS), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (16) Johnson v. Lafarr, 9:26-cv-0462 (GTS/MJK), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); (17) Johnson v. Millis, 9:26-cv-0463 (MAD/DJS), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 24, 2026); (18) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
0464 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (19) Johnson v. Warren County
Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0465 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (20)
Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0466 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1
(N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (21) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
0467 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (22) Johnson v. Warren County
Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0468 (BKS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 25, 2026); (23)
Johnson v. Prime Care Medical Group, 9:26-cv-0469 (GTS/PJE), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed
Mar. 25, 2026); (24) Johnson v. Lowe, 9:26-cv-0495 (AJB/CBF), Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed
Mar. 27, 2026); (25) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-0496 (BKS/PJE),
Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 29, 2026); (26) Johnson v. Grey, 9:26-cv-0498 (ECC/MJK),
Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 27, 2026); (27) Johnson v. Coons, 9:26-cv-0499 (AJB/MJK),
Dkt. No. 1 (N.D.N.Y. filed Mar. 27, 2026).
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 8 of 10

9
APPENDIX B
(Cases Filed on April 4, 2026)
(1) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00552 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (2) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00553 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (3) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00554 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (4) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00555 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (5) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
00556 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (6) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional
Facility, 9:26-cv-00557 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (7) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00558 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (8) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00559 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (9) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00560 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (10) Johnson v. Warren
County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00561 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (11)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00562 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (12)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00563 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (13)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00564 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (14)
Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00565 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (15) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00566 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (16) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00567 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (17) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00568 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (18) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00569 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (19) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00570 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (20) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00571 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (21) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00572 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (21) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00573 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (23) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00574 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (24) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00575 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (25) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00576 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (26) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
00577 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (27) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-
00578 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (28) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional
Facility, 9:26-cv-00579 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (29) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00580 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (30) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00581 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (31) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00582 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (32) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00583 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (33) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00584 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (34) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00585 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (35) Johnson v. Warren
County Jail, 9:26-cv-00586 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (36) Johnson v. Warren
County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00587 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (37)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00588 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (38)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00589 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (39)
Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00590 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 9 of 10

10
Apr. 6, 2026); (40) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00591 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (41) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00592 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (42) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00593 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (43) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00594 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (44) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00595(LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (45) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00596 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (46) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00597 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (47) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00598 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (48) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00599 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (49) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00600 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (50) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00601 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (51) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00602 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (52) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00604 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (53) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00605 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (54) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00606 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (55) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00607 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (56) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00608 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (57) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00609 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (58) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00610 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (59) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00611 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026); (60) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00612 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (61) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00614 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (62) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00615 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (63) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00616 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (64) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00617 (LEK/PJE)
(N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (65) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-
00618 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (66) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-
00619 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (67) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-
00620 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (68) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-
00621 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (69) Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-
00622 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (70) Johnson v. Warren County Correctional
Facility, 9:26-cv-00623 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (71) Johnson v. Warren
County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00624 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (72)
Johnson v. Warren County Jail, 9:26-cv-00626 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed Apr. 6, 2026); (73)
Johnson v. Warren County Correctional Facility, 9:26-cv-00628 (LEK/PJE) (N.D.N.Y. filed
Apr. 6, 2026).
Case 9:26-pf-00002-BKS Document 1 Filed 04/08/26 Page 10 of 10