9:22-cv-01161•Perry v. Christensen
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAMIEN PERRY, Petitioner, v. DAVID CHRISTENSEN, Respondent. 9:22-cv-1161 (BKS/ML) Appearances: For Petitioner: 25201-014 Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution P.O. BOX 2000 Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640 For Defendant: Ranson Reynolds, III, Assistant United States Attorney 100 South Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13261-7198 Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Chief United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Petitioner Damien Perry, a federal inmate, filed a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 asserting that the Bureau of Prisons failed to credit him with 1,462 days that he served awaiting trial and sentencing. (Dkt. No. 1). On March 20, 2023, Respondent filed an answer, accompanied by records related to the matter. (Dkt. No. 6). Petitioner filed a reply on April 17, 2023. (Dkt. No. 12). This matter was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric who, on February 4, 2026, issued a Report-Recommendation and Order recommending, inter Case 9:22-cv-01161-BKS-ML Document 26 Filed 02/26/26 Page 1 of 2
2 alia, that the Petition be denied as moot because Petitioner had been released from custody pursuant to an Order of Clemency on July 16, 2025. (Dkt. No. 24, at 8). Magistrate Judge Lovric advised the parties that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the report, and that the failure to object to the report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. (Dkt. No. 24, at 16). No objections were filed. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none in the recommendation that the Petition be denied as moot, the Court adopts that recommendation. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the recommendation in the Report-Recommendation that the Petition be denied as moot (Dkt. No. 24) is ADOPTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2026 Syracuse, New York Case 9:22-cv-01161-BKS-ML Document 26 Filed 02/26/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.