5:25-cv-01199•Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al
Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al
5:25-cv-01199Nynd7 avr. 2026
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE PRINELL PAUL Plaintiff(s) vs. CASE NUMBER: 5:25-cv-1199 (GTS/MJK) CARDEN, DOTZLER, HAMMOND LAW, PLLC LAW FIRM, CLIFFORD CARDEN, Attorney at Law; MATTHEW DOTZLER, Attorney at Law; DAVID HAMMOND, Attorney at Law; BRIAN TEDD, Attorney at Law; and NICHOLAS HURTADO, Attorney at Law Defendant(s) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Katz’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, dated April 7, 2026. DATED: April 7, 2026 s/ Abbigail Selnick Deputy Clerk Case 5:25-cv-01199-GTS-MJK Document 9 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.