2:25-cv-06362•In the Matter of the Complaint of Michael Richardelli
Texte intégral
Michael E. Stern, Esq. James E. Mercante, Esq. Joanna M. Grillo, Esq. GALLO VITUCCI KLAR LLP Attorneys for Petitioner 90 Broad Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10004 Tel: 212-683-7100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT - of - MICHAEL RICHARDELLI, as Owner of a 1993 Pursuit Express Fisherman vessel named “EVENTIDE” for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability, Petitioner. __________________________________________ Civil Action No.: 25-cv-6362 ORDER A Complaint having been filed herein on November 17, 2025, by the above-named Petitioner, MICHAEL RICHARDELLI, as Owner of a 1993 Pursuit Fisherman vessel named “EVENTIDE", pursuant to 46 U.S.C. §§ 30501 et seq., involving admiralty and maritime claims within the meaning of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, concerning any claims for loss, damage, and/or injury, arising or resulting from an alleged personal injury incident claimed to have occurred on July 26, 2025, while Petitioner’s vessel was upon the navigable waters of the United States, as more fully described in the Complaint; AND the Complaint having stated that Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
2 on the day of the alleged incident did not exceed the sum of $24,000; AND Petitioner has filed with the Court an Ad Interim Stipulation for value for the benefit of any and all claimants, with surety, equal to the amount of Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, as of the date of the alleged incident, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of said security, executed by marine insurer Progressive Northern Insurance Company. NOW, on motion of attorneys for Petitioner, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-described Ad Interim Stipulation for Value, with interest as aforesaid, filed by Petitioner for the benefit of any and all claimants as security representing the Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, as of the date of the alleged incident, be and is hereby approved; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court, only upon motion and good cause shown, shall cause appraisement of the value of Petitioner’s interest in the vessel, on the date of the alleged incident, and may thereupon order said security increased or reduced if it finds the amount thereof insufficient or excessive; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any claimant in these proceedings may express, only upon motion and good cause shown and by written notice filed with the Court and served upon all parties of record, its dissatisfaction with Progressive Northern Insurance Company as surety. In this event, Petitioner shall within thirty (30) days of the entry of an order by the Court concerning the surety, cause security to be posted in the form provided by Supplemental Rule F(1) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and satisfactory to this Court failing which the injunction entered concurrently herewith will be vacated as to all claimants, and the Court Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
4 any jurisdiction, or otherwise, against the Petitioner, insurers, and/or the vessel, and the taking of any steps, entry of any order or judgment and the making or continuing of any motion in and/or concerning such actions, suits or proceedings except in this action, with respect to the aforesaid alleged incident, be and they hereby are restrained, stayed and enjoined until the hearing and determination of this action, and all warrants of arrest of the vessel, and/or attachments issued or sought in such other suits, actions or legal proceedings be and the same are hereby dissolved and further warrants of arrest of the vessel, and/or attachments are hereby prohibited; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order as a Restraining Order be made through the Post Office by mailing a conformed copy hereof to the person or persons to be restrained, or to their respective attorneys. Dated: December 21, 2025 U.S.D.J. /s/ Nusrat J. Choudhury Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document6- Filed 12/21/25 Page 1 of 4 PagelD #: <pagelD> Michael E. Stern, Esq. James E. Mercante, Esq. Joanna M. Grillo, Esq. GALLO VITUCCI KLAR LLP Attorneys for Petitioner 90 Broad Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10004 Tel: 212-683-7100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT Civil Action No.: 25-cv-6362 - of - ORDER MICHAEL RICHARDELLI, as Owner of a 1993 Pursuit Express Fisherman vessel named “EVENTIDE” for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability, Petitioner. A Complaint having been filed herein on November 17, 2025, by the above-named Petitioner, MICHAEL RICHARDELLI, as Owner of a 1993 Pursuit Fisherman vessel named “EVENTIDE", pursuant to 46 U.S.C. §§ 30501 er seq., involving admiralty and maritime claims within the meaning of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, concerning any claims for loss, damage, and/or injury, arising or resulting from an alleged personal injury incident claimed to have occurred on July 26, 2025, while Petitioner’s vessel was upon the navigable waters of the United States, as more fully described in the Complaint; AND the Complaint having stated that Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO 2 on the day of the alleged incident did not exceed the sum of $24,000; AND Petitioner has filed with the Court an Ad Interim Stipulation for value for the benefit of any and all claimants, with surety, equal to the amount of Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, as of the date of the alleged incident, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of said security, executed by marine insurer Progressive Northern Insurance Company. NOW, on motion of attorneys for Petitioner, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-described Ad Interim Stipulation for Value, with interest as aforesaid, filed by Petitioner for the benefit of any and all claimants as security representing the Petitioner’s interest in the value of the vessel, as of the date of the alleged incident, be and is hereby approved; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court, only upon motion and good cause shown, shall cause appraisement of the value of Petitioner’s interest in the vessel, on the date of the alleged incident, and may thereupon order said security increased or reduced if it finds the amount thereof insufficient or excessive; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any claimant in these proceedings may express, only upon motion and good cause shown and by written notice filed with the Court and served upon all parties of record, its dissatisfaction with Progressive Northern Insurance Company as surety. In this event, Petitioner shall within thirty (30) days of the entry of an order by the Court concerning the surety, cause security to be posted in the form provided by Supplemental Rule F(1) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and satisfactory to this Court failing which the injunction entered concurrently herewith will be vacated as to all claimants, and the Court Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: <pageID> Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document6- Filed 12/21/25 Page 3 of 4 PagelD #: <pagelD> will make such further orders as the justice of the cause may require; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Notice shall be issued by the Clerk of this Court to all persons, firms, entities or corporations, having any claim or suit against the Petitioner or its vessel, with respect to which the Complaint seeks exoneration from or limitation of liability, admonishing them to file their respective claims with the Clerk of this Court, in writing, and to deliver or mail to the attorneys for the Petitioner, Michael E. Stern, Esq., James E. Mercante, Esq. and Joanna Maria Grillo, Esq., GALLO VITUCCI KLAR LLP, 90 Broad Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10004, a copy’ thereof, ON OR BEFORE THE 20th DAY OF January, 2026, or be defaulted; and that if any claimant desires to contest either the right to exoneration from or the might to limitation of liability, such claimant shall file an Answer to the Complaint on or before the aforesaid date, unless the claim has included an Answer to the Complaint, as required by Supplemental Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and deliver or mail a copy to the attorneys for the Petitioner, or be defaulted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the aforesaid Notice shall be published in a newspaper with a general circulation, once a week for four (4) weeks before the return date of said Notice, as provided by the aforesaid Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and copies of said Notice shall be mailed by Petitioner in accordance with this Rule to every person known to have any claim against the vessel, or Petitioner, or to its attorneys; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the further prosecution of any and all actions, suits and proceedings already commenced and the commencement or prosecution hereafter of any and all suits, actions, or proceedings of any nature and description whatsoever in any Court of 4 any jurisdiction, or otherwise, against the Petitioner, insurers, and/or the vessel, and the taking of any steps, entry of any order or judgment and the making or continuing of any motion in and/or concerning such actions, suits or proceedings except in this action, with respect to the aforesaid alleged incident, be and they hereby are restrained, stayed and enjoined until the hearing and determination of this action, and all warrants of arrest of the vessel, and/or attachments issued or sought in such other suits, actions or legal proceedings be and the same are hereby dissolved and further warrants of arrest of the vessel, and/or attachments are hereby prohibited; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order as a Restraining Order be made through the Post Office by mailing a conformed copy hereof to the person or persons to be restrained, or to their respective attorneys. Dated: December 21, 2025 U.S.D.J. /s/ Nusrat J. Choudhury Case 2:25-cv-06362-NJC-JMW Document 6 Filed 12/21/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.