Shamberger v. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners PLLC

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
HAZEL SHAMBERGER,
Plaintiff,
– against –
ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID,
CRANE & PARTNERS PLLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
25-cv-01043 (NCM) (ARL)
NATASHA C. MERLE, United States District Judge:
This 	Court 	has 	received 	the 	Report 	and 	Recommendation 	(“R&R”) 	dated
November 20, 2025, from the Honorable Arlene R. Lindsay, United States Magistrate
Judge. ECF No. 17. No objections have been filed.
The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has
been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Park v. Kim, No. 20-cv-02636,
2022 WL 3643966, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2022), aff’d, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024).
Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that
there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian,
Equifax, No. 17-cv-00371, 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting
Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189
(E.D.N.Y. 2011)).
Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and
Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
Case 2:25-cv-01043-NCM-ARL Document 19 Filed 12/19/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike the motion to
amend, ECF No. 13, and the motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 15, filed by non-party
Gerald Shamberger from the docket. Plaintiff is reminded that only a party or an attorney
representing a party may file papers in this action. See Wilburn v. Nguyen, No. 23-cv-
04082, 2023 WL 4163510, at *1 n.1 (E.D.N.Y. June 23, 2023) (“The Court cannot consider
submissions signed by non-parties to this action unless it is submitted by an attorney
representing the party.”). Plaintiff is further reminded that she shall file a letter response
of three pages or fewer to defendant’s letter requesting a premotion conference by
December 29, 2025. See ECF Order dated November 25, 2025.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Natasha C. Merle
NATASHA C. MERLE
United States District Judge
Dated: 	December 19, 2025
Brooklyn, New York
Case 2:25-cv-01043-NCM-ARL Document 19 Filed 12/19/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>