1:25-cv-00338•Yates v. Foremost Farmers Direct Property and Casualty Insurance
Yates v. Foremost Farmers Direct Property and Casualty Insurance
1:25-cv-00338Nhd15 avr. 2026
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jackie F. Yates v. Foremost Farmers Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Case No. 25-cv-338-LM-AJ ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 24, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, Ms. Yates' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 20), and Foremost's request for summary judgment to be entered in its favor (Doc. No. 23), are denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge Date: April 15, 2026 Case 1:25-cv-00338-LM-AJ Document 32 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.