1:21-cv-00772•Porter v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Porter v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
1:21-cv-00772Nhd17 mars 2022
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kevin Porter v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent Case No. 21-cv-772-LM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 25, 2022 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rules 1(b) and 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; First Cir. LR 22.0. ____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty Chief Judge Date: March 17, 2022 cc: Kevin Porter, pro se Matthew Burrows, Esq. Case 1:21-cv-00772-LM Document 9 Filed 03/17/22 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.