Dandeneau v. FNU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Chad Dandeneau
v.
FNU LNU
Case No. 20-cv-370-JL
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated June 1, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
The court notes that the complaint itself suggests that the
plaintiff might have qualified for in forma pauperis relief had
he requested it. It is impossible for the court to ascertain
that fact on this record.
Case 1:20-cv-00370-JL Document 3 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 2

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: July 7, 2020
cc: Chad Dandeneau, pro se
Case 1:20-cv-00370-JL Document 3 Filed 07/07/20 Page 2 of 2