Woodham v. Scheffer

1:20-cv-00304Nhd24 févr. 2021

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Grace Woodham
v.
Tucker Scheffer
Case No. 20-cv-304-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated January 29, 2021. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: February 24, 2021
cc: Grace Woodham, pro se
Case 1:20-cv-00304-LM Document 7 Filed 02/24/21 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.