1:19-cv-01101•Lindsay v. Mulliens
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Anthony Lindsay v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New Hampshire Case No. 19-cv-1101-PB ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 26, 2021, grant the Warden’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) and dismiss Lindsay’s petition (Doc. No. 1), without prejudice to his ability to refile claims against a proper respondent in the district in which he is incarcerated. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: April 21, 2021 cc: Anthony Lindsay, pro se /s/Paul Barbadoro Case 1:19-cv-01101-PB Document 13 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.