Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al

1:18-cv-00670Nhd10 sept. 2018

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Lamont Paige, and
Kevin Whitaker
v.
FCI-Berlin, Warden, Robert Hazlewood,
and FNU Feliciano, Chaplain, FCI-Berlin
Case No. 18-cv-670-SM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated August 8, 2018, for the reasons set forth
therein. Plaintiff Paige’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is
hereby denied.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district
court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on
appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617
F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of
Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see
also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.
1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection
to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: September 10, 2018
Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 2
cc: 	Lamont E. Paige, pro se
Kevin Whitaker, pro se
T. David Plourde, AUSA
Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.