1:18-cv-00554•Perfetto v. Hanks, et al
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jonathan Andrew Perfetto v. Helen Hanks, et al Case No. 18-cv-554 SE ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated May 26, 2022. Plaintiff Jonathan Perfetto’s motion (Doc. No. 73) to voluntarily dismiss the claim previously identified as Claim 3(a) is granted. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate’s report will waive the right to appeal). ____________________________ Samantha D. Elliott United States District Judge Date: June 14, 2022 cc: Jonathan Andrew Perfetto, pro se Lawrence Gagnon, Esq. Case 1:18-cv-00554-SE Document 76 Filed 06/14/22 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.