1:16-cv-00174•Yahtues v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
Yahtues v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
1:16-cv-00174Nhd10 sept. 2021
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Malachi I. Yahtues v. Case No. 16-cv-174-SM David Dionne and Willie Scurry REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Malachi Yahtues has filed a “Notice of Dismissal” (Doc. No. 272), asking the Court “to dismiss his remaining claims in the above docket.” Doc. No. 272, at 1. The defendants have filed a response (Doc. No. 273) asserting that Mr. Yahtues’s “Notice of Dismissal” should be construed as a motion to dismiss Claims 5(a) and 5(b) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), 1 and, if so construed, that they do not object to the relief requested. For the reasons stated in the defendants’ response, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that Document No. 272 should be construed as a motion to dismiss Claims 5(a) and 5(b) from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), and recommends that the District Judge enter the following Order: 1. Plaintiff Malachi Yahtues’s “Notice of Dismissal” (Doc. No. 272) is construed as a motion to 1 Claims 5(a) and 5(b) are identified in the Court’s August 17, 2020 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 255, at 3), which was approved by the District Judge on September 9, 2020 (Doc. No. 257). Case 1:16-cv-00174-SM Document 274 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2 dismiss Claims 5(a) and 5(b) from this action (Doc. No. 272) and, so construed, is GRANTED. 2. All of the court orders previously issued in this case remain undisturbed and binding upon the parties. 3. As Claims 5(a) and 5(b) are the only claims remaining in this case, the case is dismissed, and any motions pending in this case are terminated. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The fourteen-day period may be extended upon motion. Failure to file specific written objections to the Report and Recommendation within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court’s order. See Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016). ____________________________ Andrea K. Johnstone United States Magistrate Judge September 10, 2021 cc: Malachi I. Yahtues, pro se Matthew Vernon Burrows, Esq. Peter A. Meyer, Esq. Sarah S. Murdough, Esq. Case 1:16-cv-00174-SM Document 274 Filed 09/10/21 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.