Ashford et al v. Google LLC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TIMOTHY L. ASHFORD and TIMOTHY L.
ASHFORD, P.C.L.L.O.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., ALPHABET, INC.,
ROSES ROSES, GO GAMERS, JOHN
DOES 1-1000, and JANE DOES 1-1000,
Defendants.
8:25CV95
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Timothy L. Ashford and Timothy L.
Ashford, 	P.C.L.L.O.’s 	(together 	“Ashford”) 	Statement 	of 	Objections 	to 	Magistrate
Judge’s Order (Filing No. 25). 	The magistrate judge’s Findings, Recommendation and
Order (Filing No. 18) was filed on June 25, 2025. Ashford did file separate Objections to
Magistrate Judge’s Order on July 6, 2025 (Filing No. 19) and on July 9, 2025 (Filing
No. 20). 	Those objections were overruled, and a Memorandum and Order accepting the
magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation was entered on August 4, 2025 (Filing
No. 23).
Ashford now files a separate Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation (Filing No. 25). 	This latest objection, which is clearly untimely under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), largely takes issue with this Court’s order
denying Ashford’s earlier motion for recusal. The undersigned issued the ruling denying
the request for a blanket recusal of all judges of the District of Nebraska (Filing No. 17),
not the magistrate judge. 	That ruling is not subject to objection under Rule 72(b)(2), or
any other rule. The objections of Ashford are therefore overruled as untimely and for all
the reasons set forth in Filing Nos. 17 and 23.
8:25-cv-00095-RFR-RCC Doc # 55 Filed: 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

2
Also pending is another motion for the recusal of Magistrate Judge Carson and the
undersigned (Filing No. 41), which again will be denied. 	In addition, Ashford has filed
two motions seeking a stay of this case (Filing Nos. 47, 54) pending a hearing in Douglas
County District Court on this case, even though it was properly removed and dismissed at
Ashford’s request. The motions to stay are also denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 14th day of November 2025.
BY THE COURT:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
Chief United States District Judge
8:25-cv-00095-RFR-RCC Doc # 55 Filed: 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>