USA v. Addison et al

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western District of North Carolina
United States of America
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
Isaiah Devon Stallworth
Case No: 0419 3:17CR00134-072
USM No: 33556-058
Date of Original Judgment: 09/20/2018
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: 04/25/2019 Joshua Carpenter
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of ☒ the defendant ☐ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ☐ the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
☐ DENIED. ☒ GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed aggregate sentence of imprisonment
(as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 111 months is reduced to 108 months .
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 04/25/2019 ,
shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
Signed: March 18, 2024
Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 3552 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 2

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 2 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)
This page contains information that should not be filed in court unless under seal.
(Not for Public Disclosure)
Isaiah Devon Stallworth	DEFENDANT:
CASE NUMBER: 0419 3:20CR00134
DISTRICT: Western District of North Carolina
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Total Offense Level: 16 Amended Total Offense Level: 16
Criminal History Category: III Criminal History Category: II
Previous Guideline Range: 27 to 33 months Amended Guideline Range: 24 to 30 months
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO THE AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
☒ The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
☐ The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the
time of sentencing as a result of a substantial assistance departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence
is comparably less than the amended guideline range.
☐
☒
The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range.
Other (explain): The aggregate sentence includes an 84-month consecutive sentence to which the Defendant was
sentenced on Count 21.
III. FACTORS CONSIDERED UNDER USSG § 1B1.10 AND 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (See Chavez-Meza v. United
States, 138 S.Ct. 1959 (2018))
Defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing
Guidelines because at the time of sentencing his criminal history category was calculated including two
“Status Points.” Defendant no longer earns “Status Points” under amended Section 4A1.1(e) of the
Sentencing Guidelines, reducing his criminal history category from III to II and his Guideline Range down
to 24 to 30 months, plus a mandatory minimum consecutive sentence of 84 months on Count 21, for an
aggregate low-end Guideline Range sentence of 108 months. Further, the Court has considered the
sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) in rendering an appropriate reduced sentence and finds
that an aggregate sentence of 108 months is sufficient but not greater than necessary to serve the purposes
of sentencing.
Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 3552 Filed 03/18/24 Page 2 of 2