USA v. Koppenhaver

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
vs. 	) 	Case No. 6:25-cr-03035-MDH
)
JEREMY KOPPENHAVER, 	)
)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 29), the
Government’s Suggestions in Opposition (Doc. 34), the Report and Recommendation of United
States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	(Doc. 	53) 	and 	Defendant’s 	Objections 	to 	the 	Report 	and
Recommendations. (Doc. 62). The motion having been fully briefed is now ripe for adjudication
on the merits.
After a careful and independent review of the parties’ submissions, the transcript from the
suppression hearing, and the Report and Recommendation, and the Defendant’s Objection, this
Court agrees with and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge (Doc. 62) in full. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Doc.
29) and Defendant’s Objections to the Reports and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 62).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 2, 2025
/s/ Douglas Harpool ________________
Case 6:25-cr-03035-BCW Document 63 Filed 12/02/25 Page 1 of 2

2
DOUGLAS HARPOOL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 6:25-cr-03035-BCW Document 63 Filed 12/02/25 Page 2 of 2