Phillips v. Tuggs et al

4:25-cv-01210Moed10 déc. 2025

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CLINT PHILLIPS, III, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. 4:25-CV-01210 SPM
)
OFFICER T. TUGGS, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is self-represented Plaintiff Clint Phillips, III’s Civil Complaint and
Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Motion for
Appointment of Counsel. [ECF Nos. 1 and 2]. Upon review, the Court finds the Application
incomplete and denies it without prejudice. [ECF No. 2]. Should Plaintiff seek to continue this
action, no later than Friday, January 9, 2025, he must pay the $405 or file a complete Application
to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Additionally, Plaintiff will be
required to submit an Amended Complaint on a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form no later
than January 9, 2025.
I. 	Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs
With the commencement of this action, Plaintiff, a frequent litigator in this Court, filed an
Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. [ECF. No. 2]. The
Application is incomplete as Plaintiff has failed to fill out his place of employment, his gross pay
(if any), all sources of income, all monthly expenses and all debts or financial obligations owed
each month. [ECF No. 2 at 1-2.]. As Plaintiff’s financial information stands currently, it appears
he can pay the full filing fee. For these reasons, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s Application to
Case: 4:25-cv-01210-SPM Doc. #: 3 Filed: 12/10/25 Page: 1 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, without prejudice. [ECF No. 3]. If he
wishes to pursue this action, he may either pay the full filing fee of $405 or submit a renewed and
complete Application no later than Friday, January 9, 2025.
II. 	Civil Complaint
Plaintiff filed this action on August 11, 2025. [ECF No. 1]. He asserts violations of his civil
rights against Unknown Tuggs, a Bellefontaine Police Officer who he alleges was acting as a
security guard during his off-duty hours at QuickTrip on August 9, 2025. Plaintiff claims that
Tuggs used excessive force when removing him from the QuickTrip and then illegally detained
him until the police could get to the store so that he could be removed from the premises.
Plaintiff, however, has failed to allege the capacity under which he is suing Defendant
Tuggs. And although he has named Tuggs as a Bellefontaine Police Officer, it appears that he was
acting as an employee of QuickTrip at the time of the incident. Plaintiff must therefore amend his
Complaint to make it clear as to the capacity under which he intends to sue Defendant Tuggs.
Additionally, Plaintiff has not indicated whether he is pursuing claims for unlawful
imprisonment in this lawsuit and if so, against whom. He must clearly state all claims for relief in
the “Statement of Claim” in his Amended Complaint.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court
Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than Friday, January 9, 2026, Plaintiff must
either pay the full filing fee of $405 or file a complete an Application to Proceed in District Court
Without Prepaying Fees or Costs.
Case: 4:25-cv-01210-SPM Doc. #: 3 Filed: 12/10/25 Page: 2 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than Friday, January 9, 2026, Plaintiff must
file an Amended Complaint on a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff an
Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, as well as a Prisoner
Civil Rights Complaint form.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in all relevant
respects, this action will be dismissed, without prejudice.
Dated this 10th day of December, 2025.
SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 4:25-cv-01210-SPM Doc. #: 3 Filed: 12/10/25 Page: 3 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.