4:25-cr-00274•USA v. Kerbrat
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) No. 4:25-CR-274 SEP ) JOEL KERBRAT, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial Date (Doc. [33]). Trial in this matter is currently set for January 12, 2026. Counsel states additional time is needed to continue plea negotiations with the Government. The Government does not oppose Defendant’s motion and Defendant has filed an executed Waiver of Speedy Trial (Doc. [33]- 1). For the reasons stated in Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that to deny Defendant’s request for a continuance “would deny counsel . . . the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence,” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and that “the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Continue (Doc. [33]) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial in this matter is continued to February 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the undersigned. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the time between January 12, 2026, and February 5, 2026, is excluded from the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Dated this 2nd day of January, 2026. _______________________________________ SARAH E. PITLYK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 4:25-cr-00274-SEP Doc. #: 34 Filed: 01/02/26 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.