Payton v. State of Minnesota

0:26-cv-01721Mnd30 avr. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Troy Mike Payton,
Petitioner,
v.
State of Minnesota,
Respondent.
File No. 26-cv-1721 (ECT/DTS)
ORDER
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on March
6, 2026. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is
therefore reviewed for clear error.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d
793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). 	Finding no clear error, and based on all the files,
records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED.
2. 	Petitioner Troy Mike Payton’s Defense Motion for Habeas Corpus Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 et seq. [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. 	This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
1 	The Clerk’s Office twice mailed the Report and Recommendation to Mr. Payton at
the Sherburne County Jail. 	The second time, it was returned with a note indicating that
Mr. Payton was “Released from Custody/No Longer at Facility.” 	See Dkt. 	The Report
and Recommendation was not re-sent because no forwarding address was available. It is
Mr. Payton’s responsibility to monitor the docket and proceedings in this case that he
initiated. 	Heiderscheid v. Dakota Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., No. 18-cv-1180 (JNE/LIB), 2020
WL 5106816, at *1 n.1 (D. Minn. Aug. 31, 2020). Mr. Payton has had nearly two months
since the Report and Recommendation was issued to contact the Court about the status of
his case. 	He has failed to do so. 	For these reasons, Mr. Payton’s possible lack of
knowledge regarding the case’s status is his responsibility and gives no reason to delay
consideration or acceptance of the Report and Recommendation.
CASE 0:26-cv-01721-ECT-DTS Doc. 6 Filed 04/30/26 Page 1 of 2
2
4. 	Payton’s Motion Requesting to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915 [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 30, 2026 	s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court
CASE 0:26-cv-01721-ECT-DTS Doc. 6 Filed 04/30/26 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.