0:26-cv-00643•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DAVID CASTILLO TAPIA, Petitioner, vs. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, et al., Respondents. 0:26-CV-643 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS The petitioner is a noncitizen currently detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He contends his detention is unlawful because he was denied a bond hearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1) and 1236.1(d)(1). See filing 1. The government responds that detention is mandatory, not discretionary, and the petitioner is not eligible to be released. See filing 7. The briefing demonstrates that the petitioners' application for the writ only presents issue of law—and the government concedes this point, see filing 7 at 12—so the Court declines to hold a hearing. See § 2243. The Court will grant the petition for the reasons thoroughly articulated by this Court in Velasco Hurtado v. Bondi, No. 0:26-CV-546, 2026 WL 184884 (D. Minn. Jan. 24, 2026). The government shall immediately—if necessary—return the petitioner to the state of Minnesota1 and release him from custody. 1 The Court notes that, as of today, the petitioner doesn't seem to appear in the ICE Online Detainee Locator System, https://locator.ice.gov/odls. It's not clear whether that might mean that the petitioner is being or has been transported, or whether it's simply a record-keeping problem. But the Court retains jurisdiction over a properly-filed habeas petition even if the CASE 0:26-cv-00643-JMG-DJF Doc. 8 Filed 01/28/26 Page 1 of 2
2 IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) is granted. 2. The government shall, if necessary, immediately return the petitioner to the District of Minnesota. 3. When the petitioner is in Minnesota, the government shall immediately release him from custody. 4. No later than January 30, 2026, the government shall file a status report certifying compliance with this Order. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 28th day of January, 2026. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard Senior United States District Judge petitioner is later moved. Ex parte Endo, 323 U.S. 283, 307 (1944). From an excess of caution, the Court will direct the government to return the petitioner to Minnesota, in the event that he has been moved. CASE 0:26-cv-00643-JMG-DJF Doc. 8 Filed 01/28/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.