Maestas v. Eischen

0:24-cv-04337Mnd13 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ELESAIO BEN GUZM MAESTAS,
Petitioner,
v.
B. EISCHEN, Warden,
Respondent.
Case No. 24‐CV‐4337 (NEB/SGE)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
The Court has received the October 9, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Elkins (ECF No. 12.) No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear
error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above‐captioned
matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is ACCEPTED;
2. 	The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and
3. 	The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 13, 2026 	BY THE COURT:
s/Nancy E. Brasel
Nancy E. Brasel
United States District Judge
CASE 0:24-cv-04337-NEB-SGE Doc. 13 Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.