Boyd et al v. Target Corp.

0:23-cv-02668Mnd27 avr. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CIVIL MOTION HEARING
Harmony DeFlorio, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
Target Corp.,
Defendant.
COURT MINUTES
BEFORE: Dulce J. Foster
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Case No: 23-cv-2668 (KMM/DJF)
Date: April 27, 2026
Venue: Zoom Video Hearing
Court Reporter: Rachel Braun
Recording: Zoom Recording
Time Commenced: 2:30 P.M.
Time Concluded: 3:51 P.M.
Time in Court: 1 Hour and 21 Minutes
APPEARANCES:
Plaintiff: Counsel – Rachel Kristine Tack, Brian Gudmunson, Jason Earley
Defendant: Counsel – Ana Tagvoryan, Melanie S. Carter, Fiona Steele
PROCEEDINGS: Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant presented oral argument regarding
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 157) (“Motion”). For
the reasons stated on the record, the Motion was DENIED.
ORDER TO BE ISSUED NO ORDER TO BE ISSUED R&R TO BE ISSUED NO R&R TO BE ISSUED
Exhibits retained by the Court Exhibits returned to counsel
Date: April 27, 2026 /s William Chorba
Law Clerk
CASE 0:23-cv-02668-KMM-DJF Doc. 175 Filed 04/27/26 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.