0:21-cr-00101•USA v. Wilson
Texte intégral
CASE 0:21-cr-00101-JRT-DTS Doc. 149 Filed 05/07/26 Page 1 of 1
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
CASE 0:21-cr-00101-JRT-DTS Doc. 149 Filed 05/07/26 Page 1 of 1 AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Minnesota United States of America V. Jeremy Wade Wilson Case No: CR21-101(1) JRT/DTS USM No: 42426-509 Date of Original Judgment: 02/03/2025 Date of Previous Amended Judgment: (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) - Robert A. Lengeling Defendant's Attorney ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in months is reduced to the last judgment issued) of (See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted) The Amendment is not applicable to the Defendant, pursuant to USSG §1B1.10(a)(2)(A). The defendant does not qualify as a zero-point offender, and he did not incur any status points. Moreover, the Court applied a downward variance at sentencing below the low-end of the advisory range. Therefore, the defendant is ineligible for a sentencing reduction. ACCORDINGLY, the Pro Se Motion to Reduce Sentence -USSC Amendment 821 filed by Jeremy Wade Wilson (Doc. No. 145) is DENIED. Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 02/03/2025 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Order Date: 05/07/2026 /s/ John R. Tunheim Judge's signature Effective Date: John R. Tunheim, United States District Court Judge (if different from order date) Printed name and title AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO AMA
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.