USA v. Arellano et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

CASE 0:19-cr-00116-JRT-HB
Doc. 669 Filed 03/06/26 Page 1 of 1
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Minnesota
United States of America V. Mike Paul Arellano
Case No:
CR19-116(1) JRT/HB
USM No: 22011-041
Date of Original Judgment: 10/30/2019
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)
Defendant's Attorney
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of the defendant
the Director of the Bureau of Prisons
the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
DENIED.
GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in months is reduced to
the last judgment issued) of
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)
Tthe amendment did not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range, and thus the defendant is not covered by USSG §1B1.10(a)(2)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). At the time of sentencing, 2 status points were applied under USSG §4A1.1(d) (now (e)) as the defendant committed the instant offense while under a criminal justice sentence for Fifth Degree Possession Controlled Substance (Docket No .: 02-CR-16-7034) and Fourth Degree Assault (Docket No .: 70-CR-18-8527). Under the amended guideline, the defendant would receive only 1 status point, resulting a total criminal history score of: 42 (rather than 43). He remains in a criminal history category VI and received a sentence that was lower than the minimum of the applicable range.
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated IT IS SO ORDERED.
07/19/2022 shall remain in effect.
Order Date:
03/06/2026
/s/ John R. Tunheim
Judge's signature
Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
John R. Tunheim, United States District Court Judge
Printed name and title
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO