IN RE: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

0:15-md-02666Mnd5 mars 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR 	MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS)
WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS 	ORDER
LIABILITY LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
1. 	Case No. 25-cv-02537 (Casteel v. 3M Company et al)
2. 	Case No. 25-cv-02540 (Earl v. 3M Company et al)
3. 	Case No. 25-cv-02660 (Richardson v. 3M Company et al)
4. 	Case No. 25-cv-02924 (Bearman v. 3M Company et al)
In a Report and Recommendation dated January 22, 2026, the Honorable David T.
Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the four actions listed above
be dismissed with prejudice. No objection has been filed. Based on a de novo review of
the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition
[Docket No. 3322].
Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated
above, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The following actions are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In each
action, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment.
1) 	Case No. 25-cv-02537 (Casteel v. 3M Company et al)
2) 	Case No. 25-cv-02540 (Earl v. 3M Company et al)
3) 	Case No. 25-cv-02660 (Richardson v. 3M Company et al)
4) 	Case No. 25-cv-02924 (Bearman v. 3M Company et al)
Dated: March 5, 2026
s/Joan N. Ericksen
JOAN N. ERICKSEN
United States District Judge
CASE 0:15-md-02666-JNE-DTS Doc. 3353 Filed 03/05/26 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.