1:26-cr-00001•USA v. Scholten
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES PHILLIP SCHOLTEN, Defendant. ________________________________/ Hon. Jane M. Beckering Case No. 1:26-cr-1 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to W.D.Mich. LCrR. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on January 20, 2026, after receiving consent of defendant and all counsel in writing and on the record. At the hearing, defendant James Phillip Scholten entered a plea of guilty to the Felony Information in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In the Felony Information, defendant is charged with Tax Evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact. I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to the Felony Information be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge. Case 1:26-cr-00001-JMB ECF No. 10, PageID.<pageID> Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Dated: January 20, 2026 /s/ Sally J. Berens SALLY J. BERENS U.S. Magistrate Judge OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Case 1:26-cr-00001-JMB ECF No. 10, PageID.<pageID> Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.