Ludwick v. Clinton, County of et al

1:25-cv-00320Miwd16 déc. 2025

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHEALA MICHELLE LUDWICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CLINTON COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________/
Case No. 1:25-cv-320
HON. JANE M. BECKERING
ORDER
This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Dawn Thelen filed
a Motion to Dismiss, and Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30). The matter
was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 38) on
November 26, 2025, recommending that this Court grant the motion1 and dismiss Defendant
Thelen from this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on all parties that have
appeared to date. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 38) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is
GRANTED. Defendant Thelen is DISMISSED from this action.
Dated: December 16, 2025 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
JANE M. BECKERING
United States District Judge
1 The Magistrate Judge considered the Motion to Dismiss, and Alternatively, Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 30) as a motion for summary judgment (see ECF No. 38 at PageID.201).
Case 1:25-cv-00320-JMB-SJB ECF No. 40, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/16/25 Page 1
of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.