Vance v. Oakland, County of et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
KARYONDA P. VANCE,
Plaintiff(s), 	Case No. 24-10463
v. 	Judge Matthew F. Leitman
OAKLAND, COUNTY OF, et al.,
Defendant(s).
______________________________________/
Order Regarding Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Using Media File Upload
When a party motions for leave to file exhibits using the Media File Upload, the
party must follow R19(c) of the ECF Policies and Procedures and include the following in
its motion.
1. 	A statement regarding concurrence pursuant to L.R. 7.1(a);
2. 	A description of the content of the media file;
3. 	A concise explanation of how the media file provides factual support to the
motion, response, reply or memorandum;
4. 	Whether the media file has been or will be used in a court proceeding; and
5. 	Whether the content of the media file complies with the privacy protections
outlined in the E-Government Act of 2002 and all other applicable law (see R21).
Case 2:24-cv-10463-MFL-APP ECF No. 45, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/31/25 Page 1 of 2

The current motion filed does not meet these requirements. The party is
instructed to provide this information in a statement filed on the docket by
November 3, 2025.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2025 	/s/Matthew F. Leitman__________
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-10463-MFL-APP ECF No. 45, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/31/25 Page 2 of 2