2:21-cr-00004•USA v. TALMER
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE KRISTALYN TALMER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 2:20-cr-00084-GZS 2:21-cr-00004-GZS 2:22-cv-00104-GZS 2:23-cv-00110-GZS ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED DECISION On October 30, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 167 in 2:20-cr-84 & ECF No. 45 in 2:21-cr-4). No objections have been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Recommended Decision (ECF No. 167/45) is hereby ADOPTED. 2. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases. 3. Petitioner’s Amended Motion for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 155/35) is hereby DENIED. A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases is hereby DENIED because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 14th day of November, 2023. Case 2:21-cr-00004-JAW Document 46 Filed 11/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.