1:18-cr-10468•USA v. Goncalves et al
Texte intégral
United States District Court
District of Massachusetts
United States of America,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
Edward Chapman,
Defendant .
GORTON, J.
Criminal Action No.
18-10468-NMG
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Pending before the Court the Renewed Motion for
Compassionate Release pursuant to 18 U. S . C . §3582 (Docket No .
1453) of defendant Edward Chapman (" Chapman " or " defendant " ) .
Defendant filed a similar motion in July , 2022 , which was denied
without prejudice . Because the Court concludes that no
extraordinary and compelling reasons exist to justify his early
release , the motion will be denied .
I . Background
The background of Chapman ' s criminal history and sentencing
is described in the Court ' s first denial of compassionate
release (Docket No . 1222) and need not be reiterated here .
In the pending motion , Chapman argues that several of the
medical issues cited in his original motion have not improved .
Specifically , he alleges that he has high blood pressure ,
diabetes , a heart condition , seizures and a metal foreign object
-1 -
Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 1 of 6inside his abdomen which the government refuses to remove . These facts are substantially similar to those in his original motion , albeit more severe due to the ongoing nature of the purported ailments . Furthermore , Chapman is now concerned about his eight - year - old son who has been in the custody of a family friend . Chapman contends that his compassionate release is now necessary because his friend has recently relinquished her duties as the child ' s primary caregiver . The government opposes the motion . It argues that Chapman ' s medical condition has remained unchanged since the denial of his first motion for compassionate release and that the motion does not warrant reconsideration . With respect to the metal object in Cha p man ' s abdomen , the government asserts that it is Chapman , rather than the government , who has impeded further diagnostics and care . II. Motion for Compassionate Release A. Legal Standard A court may reduce a defendant ' s term of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U. S . C . § 3582(c) only if it finds that there are " extraordinary and compelling reasons " warranting such a reduction . 18 U. S . C . §3582 (c) (1) (A) (i) . Even if " extraordinary and compelling reasons " exist , a court should only grant a motion for release if it determines that the reduction is - 2- Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 2 of 6
warranted under the particular circumstances of the case . See
United States v . Saccoccia , 10 F . 4th 1 , 4 (1st Cir . 2021) .
In 2023 , after the Court ruled on Chapman ' s first §3582
motion , the United States Sentencing Commission (" the USSC " )
clarified the meaning of " extraordinary and compelling reasons "
within the context §3582 (c) (1) (A) (i) . As applicable to the
pending motion , the updated guidance outlines medical and
familial circumstances which qualify a defendant for relief
under the statute .
A. Application
i. Medical Circumstances
Defendant suggests that his medical circumstances qualify
as extraordinary and compelling under the new USSC guidance .
Specifically , the guidel i nes now provide the following as
circumstances which the Court should consider in applying
§3582(c) (1) (A) :
(C) The defendant is suffering from a medical
condition that requires long-term or
specialized medical care that is not being
provided and without which the defendant is at
risk of serious deterioration in heal th or
death .
(D) The defendant presents the following
circumstances-
( i) the defendant is housed at a
correctional facility affected or
at imminent risk of being affected by (I)
an ongoing outbreak of infectious
disease , or (II) an ongoing public health
- 3 -
Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 3 of 6emergency declared by the appropriate federa l , s t a t e , or local au t hority ; (ii) due to personal health risk factors and custodial status , the defendant is at increased risk of suffering severe medical complications or death as a result of exposure to the ongoing outbreak of infectious disease or the ongoing public health emergency described in clau s e (i) ; and (iii) s u ch risk cannot be adequately mitigated in a timely manner . U. S . S . G. 1B1 . 13(b) (1) . Chapman explains that 1 ) the metal object in his abdomen requires specialized t reatment which he is n ot current l y receiving and 2) his medical condition places him at an increased risk of contracting COVID - 19 . The Court concludes that the amended guidel i nes do not alter the situation . Wi th respect to the metal foreign object , Chapman has made no showing that the government refuses to treat his condition . Rather , his medical history indicates that he has repeatedly refused t o follow the government ' s recommendation f o r further test i ng or treatment . Chapman has also made no sh o wing tha t FCI Edge f ield , where he is currently incarcerated , is the subject of any ongoing outbreak of an infectious disease or public health emergency . ii. Familial Circumstances Next , Chapman portends that his release is warranted based upon the need to become the primary caretake to his eight - year - - 4- Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 4 of 6
old son. The guidelines state that the "death or incapacitation of the caregiver of the defendant's minor child" may qualify as an extraordinary and compelling reason for release, U.S.S . G. 1Bl.13(b) (3) (A), but that is unavailing. Chapman has made no allegations that his son's caregiver has died or become incapacitated, only that she has recanted her decision to care for the child. With respect to his claim that he is the only replacement caregiver, courts in this circuit have repeatedly held that conclusory statements regarding familial circumstances are insufficient to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. See, e.g., United States v . Hodges, No. 2 : 23-CR-00048-JAW-1 , 2025 WL 1796098, at *8 (D. Me . June 30 , 2025); United States v. Figueroa-Gibson, No. CR 16-802 (RAM), 2024 WL 376432, at *6 (D . P . R. Jan . 31, 2024); United States V. Cameron, No . 1:13-CR-00001-JAW-1, 2024 WL 5090191, at *15 (D. Me. Dec. 12, 2024). Further , documentation submitted by Chapman indicates that "family is currently being vetted for potential placement" of his son. Furthermore, the Court notes that even if Chapman's medical or familial circumstances rose to the level of extraordinary and compelling, his criminal history counsels against early release. Chapman's sentence reflects the severity and history of his drug offenses, and any reduction in that sentence would fail to account for the dangerous nature of those crimes. -5- Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 5 of 6
• l
ORDER
For the forgoing reasons , defendant ' s Renewed Motion for
Compassionate Release (Docket No . 1453) is DENIED.
So ordered.
NatilllielM.Gton
Senior United States District Judge
Dated : February {/ , 2026
- 6-
Case 1:18-cr-10468-NMG Document 1480 Filed 02/11/26 Page 6 of 6Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.