Gray (ID 2000084262) v. Easley

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
MARVIN L. GRAY, JR.,
Petitioner,
v. 	CASE NO. 25-3197-JWL
TIM EASLEY 1 ,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on September 18, 2025
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Petitioner Marvin L. Gray, Jr., a state prisoner who, at the time,
was incarcerated at Hutchinson Correctional Facility (“HCF”) in Hutchinson, Kansas. On
December 9, 2025, the Court granted Petitioner until and including January 12, 2026 in which to
file a motion to stay this matter and hold it in abeyance. (Doc. 12, p. 9.) Petitioner was informed
that if he “fails to timely file a motion to stay, this matter will be dismissed with prejudice because
none of the grounds for relief asserted in the second amended petition were properly exhausted
and Petitioner has not shown that an exception to the exhaustion requirement applies.” Id. On
January 21, 2026, because the Court had not received a motion to stay from Petitioner, the Court
dismissed this matter with prejudice, declined to issue a certificate of appealability, and entered
1 When Petitioner filed the petition that began this case, he named the State of Kansas as Respondent. (Doc. 1.) The
proper respondent in a federal habeas action by a state prisoner, however, is the person who has custody over the
petitioner. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004) (“[I]n habeas challenges to present physical confinement
. . . the default rule is that the proper respondent is the warden of the facility where the prisoner is being held.”). Thus,
in an order dated September 29, 2025, the Court substituted Dan Schnurr, the warden of Hutchinson Correctional
Facility, where Petitioner was confined, as Respondent. (See Doc. 3, p. 1.) According to the return address on the
envelope containing Petitioner’s most recent filing in this case, Petitioner has been transferred to and currently is
confined at Larned State Correctional Facility in Larned, Kansas. (Doc. 15-1.) Thus, Tim Easley, the current warden
of Larned State Correctional Facility will be substituted as Respondent in this matter.
Case 5:25-cv-03197-JWL Document 17 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 3

2
judgment. (Docs. 13 and 14.)
On February 18, 2026, the Court received from Petitioner a letter to the District Court
Clerk, which the Court liberally construes as a motion to reconsider the dismissal. (Doc. 15.) The
motion was mailed to the Court from Larned State Correctional Facility (“LSCF”) in Larned,
Kansas. (See Doc. 15-1.) In the motion, Petitioner asserts that he has been held in segregation, but
he “turned in [his] motion for stay to be e-filed [on] December 18, 2025” and was “assured” by
staff that the motion was filed. (Doc. 15, p. 1.) Petitioner states that the next thing he received was
the judgment of dismissal entered in this case. Id. He asks the Court to allow him to file the motion
to stay. Id.
In light of Petitioner’s assertion that he gave a motion to stay to HCF staff, who did not e-
file it but told him that they had done so, Petitioner’s request will be granted. The Court will direct
the clerk to reopen this case and Petitioner will be granted time in which to submit the motion to
stay this matter and hold it in abeyance. Petitioner is advised that no further extensions of this
deadline will be granted. If he does not submit a motion to stay this matter and hold it in abeyance
on or before March 23, 2026, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons
already explained to Petitioner. If Petitioner timely submits a motion to stay, the Court will
consider it and will issue further orders as necessary.
In addition, Petitioner is reminded that Local Rule 5.1(b)(3) states: 	“Each attorney or pro
se party must notify the clerk of any change of address or telephone number.” D. Kan. R. 5.1(b)(3).
If Petitioner is transferred to another facility in the future, he must notify the clerk of his change
of address. Furthermore, because LSCF is a facility with mandatory electronic filing, Petitioner
should not submit future filings by mailing them to the Court; he should follow the instructions
available at LSCF for e-filing documents with the Court.
Case 5:25-cv-03197-JWL Document 17 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 3

3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 15) is
granted. The clerk shall vacate the January 21, 2026 memorandum and order that dismissed this
case (Doc. 13) and shall vacate the judgment entered the same day (Doc. 14).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tim Easley, Warden of Larned State Correctional
Facility, where Petitioner currently is incarcerated, is substituted as Respondent in this matter.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is granted to and including March 23, 2026
in which to comply with the Court’s order of December 9, 2025 (Doc. 12) and file a motion to stay
this matter and hold it in abeyance. If he fails to do so, this matter will be dismissed with prejudice
and without further notice to Petitioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 	This 19th day of February, 2026, at Kansas City, Kansas.
S/ John W. Lungstrum
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM
United States District Judge
Case 5:25-cv-03197-JWL Document 17 Filed 02/19/26 Page 3 of 3