1:83-F-00566•IN RE: Litigation Involving Gentamicin Sulfate for Therapeutic Use in Animals
IN RE: Litigation Involving Gentamicin Sulfate for Therapeutic Use in Animals
1:83-F-00566Jpml2 juin 2015
Texte intégral
] Case MDL No. 566 Document 2 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 2 ; sunt FREE BILMULTE ! DOCKET NO. 566 EE BOY \b 1733 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION a IN RE LITIGATION INVOLVING GENTAMICIN SULFATE FOR THERAPEUTIC: USE- IN ANIMALS BE : ORDER DENYING TRANSFER*¥* i This litigation consists of four actions pending in two federal districts: three actions in the Northern District of Illinois and one action in the District of Colorado. Presently before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, to transfer the Colorado action to the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending there. The motion for transfer is submitted by Schering Corporation, the sole plaintiff in each action. On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing held, we find that Section 1407 transfer would neither serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses nor further the Just and efficient conduct of the litigation. We recognize that these actions share some questions of fact, but we are persuaded that this factor 1s outweighed in this instance by the following factors: 1) only four actions are pending before us; 2) the three Illinois actions have already been consolidated for discovery; and 3) suitable alternatives to transfer are available to the parties in order to minimize the possibility of duplicative discovery and/or conflicting pretrial rulings. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 to centralize the actions listed on the attached Schedule A be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. > FOR THE Cf,Andrew A. Caffrey Chairman ¥ Judge Milton Pollack took no part in the decision of this matter.
Case MDL No. 566 Document 2 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 2 SCHEDULE A | ADL-566 -- In Re Litigation Involving Gentamicin Sulfate for Therapeutic Use in Animals District of Colorado - Schering Corp. v. Intermountain Veterinary Suppl Inc., et al., C.A. No. 83-C-388 Northern District of Illinois Schering Corp. v. Illinois Antibiotics Co., et al., C.A. No. 83-C-1340 Schering Corp. Vv. Kalapharm, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 83-C-1341 Schering Corp. v. W.A. Butler Co., et al., C.A. No. 83-C-1820
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.