1:81-F-00476•IN RE: International Total Services, Inc., Employee Benefit Plan Litigation
IN RE: International Total Services, Inc., Employee Benefit Plan Litigation
1:81-F-00476Jpml19 mai 2015
Texte intégral
Case MDL No. 476 Document 2 Filed 05/19/15 _ Page 1 of 2 : pend EIEIAL DARE —- ba Tavzroiny Fin PENT . : DOCKET NO. 476 } send LR : REIT $ELLE i. E : co : BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGHFION 199] i nL co vi Ld dG poo IN RE INTERNATIONAL TOTAL SERVICES, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT, .. VY | ERPLAN LITIGATION CLERXGR Toi vs TRANSFER ORDER a oo Presently before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, brought by International Total Services, Inc. (Total), a defendant in the five actions listed on the attached Schedule A, for centralization of those actions so EC in a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial Co So ] proceedings. . : oo All responding parties agree on the desirability of SR or do not oppose transfer. The only dispute concerns the ’ selection of the transferee district. Total favors central- ization in the Northern District of Illinois; plaintiffs in all actions urge centralization in the Northern District of California. On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing held, oa the Panel finds that the actions in this litigation involve Co oo So common questions of fact and that centralization of the actions under Section 1407 in the Northern District of California will best serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. : : Although we are of the view that either the Northern B oo District of California or the Northern District of Illinois ’ could be described as an appropriate transferee forum for : } this litigation, we conclude that the Northern District of California is preferable. The action pending in the : Northern District of California was the first action commenced : in this litigation, and two of the five actions in this litigation are presently pending in federal district courts oo in California. ~ . | IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. E §1407, the actions listed on the following Schedule A and pending in districts other than the Northern District of California be, and the same hereby are, transferred to the : Northern District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert H. Schnacke Lo A for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with a. i the action pending in that district and listed on Schedule . A. § B . FOR THE PANEL: eT oC Andrew A. Caffrey : Chairman : .
Case MDL No. 476 Document2 Filed 05/19/15 Page 20of2 € LY " DOCKET NO. 476 é ’ SCHEDULE A ~ Northern District of Texas oo Thomas Fitzgibbon, et al. v. International Total Services,Inc., C.A. No. CA-3-81-0241-F Eastern District of New York Thomas Fitzgibbon, et al. v. International Total Services,: Inc., C.A. No. CV-81-0476 - Northern District of California Thomas Fitzgibbon, et al. v. International Total Services, Inc., C.A. No. C81-0645-RHS | Central District of California . ~ Thomas Fitzgibbon, et al. v. International Total Services, Inc., C.A. No. CV81-0773-CBN TTT _: Northern District of Illinois ) Allied Services Division Welfare Fund v. International C Co Total Services, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 81C2849
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.