IN RE: Potash Industry Antitrust Litigation

LN ~~ i
Case MDL No. 272 Document 2 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 3
HEI TPN :
Stn FECAL a
FenTa	DOCKET NO. 272 CE ! :
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRIGT, LIT TEATEON	LAR
Clepy in 3 fiers,
IN RE POTASH INDUSTRY ANTITRUST LITIGATION UF jsp fiiu
TRANSFER ORDER
It appears that all parties agree that the actions listed
on the attached Schedule A and pending in districts other than
the Northern District of Illinois should be transferred to that
district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings
with	the actions listed on Schedule A and pending there. Upon
consideration of the complaints filed, the papers submitted and
the oral arguments presented to the Panel, we find that these
actions involve common questions of fact and that transfer to
the Northern District of Illinois will serve the convenience
of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient
conduct of this litigation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all actions listed on the
attached schedule A and pending in districts other than the
Northern District of Illinois be, and the same hereby are,
transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Prentice H.
Marshall for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings
[ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 with the actions listed on Schedule
= A and pending in that district.
FOR THE PANEL:
0 oo“\ We LyJohn Minor Wisdom
Chairman

i Case MDL No. 272 Document 2 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 3
® | Schedule A |
DOCKET NO. 272 -- IN RE POTASH INDUSTRY ANTITRUST LITIGATION
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Scien-Turf-IC Sod Farms, Inc. Vv. Amax, Civil Action
Inc., et al. No. 76-C-2855
George W. Vineyard v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76-C-2833
John Hogan, et al. v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76-C-2854
: Morcor, Inc., et al, v. Amax, Inc., Civil Action
et al. No. 76-C-2522
Paul Brandlin v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76~C-2966
The State of Illinois, etc. v. Amax, Inc., Civil Action
et al. No. 76-C-3135
® Maude Albrecht, etc. v. Amax, Inc., et al. © Civil Action LL
No. 76-C-~3252
Rossville Packing Co., et al. v. Amax,. Civil Action’
Inc., et al. © No. 76-C=-3371L. ~
Wellco Chemical Co. v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76-C-3583
|
| - | | |
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
: Fairway Club, Ltd. v. Freeport Minerals Co., Civil Action
et al. No. 76-C-3267
smith & Brooks, Inc. v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action SL
No. 76-C-3079
| i: {

oo Case MDL No. 272 Document 2 Filed 05/05/15 Page 3 of 3
Page 2
® Schedule A - Docket No. 272
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS oo
Howard Williams, et al. v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. P-76-32-Ca
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Garth C. Dooley, et al. v. Amax, Inc., Civil Action
et al. No. CA 3-76-1286-G
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Dunning Farms, Inc. v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. C-1-76-401 .
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA |
Stine Seed Farm, Inc., et al. v. Amax, Civil Action
Inc., et al. No. 76-262-2
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Kenneth P. Champney v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76-2573
Paul E. Labe v. Amax, Inc., et al. Civil Action
No. 76-2552
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Suwannee Valley Cattle Co. v. Freeport civil Action
Minerals Co., et al. No. 76-1564-Civ-NCR
DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Philip and Shirley George v. Amax, Inc., Civil Action
et al. | No. 76-190 a