IN RE: Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving Antibiotic Drugs (Group I)

MERICAN CYANAMID CO. 1pABtibiptic Drug So
tn . GIVIL DOCKEE- CT,
! * ‘ y oo Le ye Ey
’ + UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Jury demand date: EE
| D.C. ForntNo. 106A Rev. - , a ) ot—_— ee
9 ) ‘ TITLE OF CASE ATTORNAYS
| I For plaiptifiiMovant:
American Cyanamid Co., Bristol-Myers Co., Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irving
Olin-Mathieson Chemical Corp., Upjohn Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts |
Co. -- to the Southern District of | Cravath, Swaine & MooreNew York | Covington & Burling
SPECIAL NOTE: 3
Panel Opinion of October 21, 196% cited Panel Opinion and Order of June 15, 197%
| © at 295 Fed. Supp. 1402, s4c	+ {I1C7) cited at 327 Foden &/7 ;
Panel opinion of Nov. 22, 1968 cited at ]
297 F. Supp. 1126 (1968) 0%	0 —omno	ho 12,1973 4
| Panel opinion of April 3, 1969 cited at 7
299 F. Supp. 1403 (1969) For defendant:
: Sep lar) J, rsd gE-
| Panel opinion on July 9, 1969 (as amended 384 furor CE £67 1| 8/7/69) cited at 301 F. Supp. 1158 hy f7 .
| Panelcopinion of August 21, 1969 cited at fre	om FL Taps FLT : k~i 303 F. Supp. 1056 (1969) # .3]
i Panel Opinion on January 30, 1970 cited at| 309 F. Supp. 155 (1970) |
Panel Opinion of December 2, 1970 cited at }
| 320 F. Supp. 586 (1971) “
oo |
J.S. 5 mailed Clerk :
J.S. 6 mailed Marshal ;
Basis of Action: Docket fee 4
@ Witness fees |
Action arose at: Depositions |

/ $Yo.
DATE | PROCEEDINGS : IE Co . rodeontNoted-—
8/5/68 |’Motion and brief filed on behalf of movant to transfer to Southern
District of New York. = oT : ’
2
8/18/68 N¥ Brief in support of motion to transfer on behalf of Texas, Wisconsin,
i Florida, et al.
8/14/68¥ "Response and brief in support thereof of plaintiff, State of .
California to motion of defendant to transfer.
{8/15/68 Brief filed on behalf of City & County of San Francisco and Respons
| in Opposition to motion to transfer.
8/19/68 "Brief in support of motion filed on behalf of State of Kansas.
})8/19/68 Letter from Special Assistant Attorney General Kenton C. Granger ),
relating to above brief.
8/19/6 Response and brief in support thereof filed on behalf of plaintiff,
a County of Los Angeles, to the motion to transfer.
Vs/21/68 *Brief on behalf of Cotter Drugs et al. in response to motion to
transfer to Southern District of New York.
8/21/6 Supplemental certificate of service filed by City & County of San
: Francisco of brief and response in opposition to motion. |
8/21/68 | Order for hearing 9/18/68, 2 p.m., signed by Judge Murrah. } -
8/21/68 Notice of hearing 9/18/68, 2 p.m., signed by Clerk of Panel and
3 sent to all attorneys. R
8/23/68 emorandum filed on behalf of States of Connecticut, Maryland &
p4 New Mexico, City of Baltimore and City and County of
Denver in support of motion to transfer to Southern District
of New York
8/28/68¢ Jey of moving defendants to memorandum of opposition to motion to ® ;	8 / transfer to the Southern District of New York.
9/3/68 Response to notice of hearing filed on behalf of Kent
AB.	# pharmaceuticals, et al re: case 68-384, .	? bh
19/17/68 1 go of State of New York in Support of Defendant's Motion to :	{ transfer. ’
9/20/63 Fiet of State of Iowa in Support of Defendants' Motion to Transfer.
9/20/68 Lcmorandum filed by Continental Vitamin Corp. in support of transfer (0+9) sent| # to Panel. i
10/21/68 Consent of transferee court, {.Y., S. signed by Judge Sugarman on Oct. 14, 1968
®.0/21/68 Filed opinion of Panel to transfer litigation to Southern District of New York
An/21/68 Richardson brug, et al., v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., et al. not on Schedule A but also
being transferred to Southern District of Mew York with rest of multidistrict
litigation.

Co Ce, CX
11/19/68 Filed order making correction in origial order filed 10/21/68 trans-
ferring to New York, S.
11/21/60 BFi1ea consent of plaintiff Ford Hopkins Co., et al. to transfer.
11/21/6809 MRriled consent of plaintiff State of New Jersey to transfer. .
11/21/68*/ Priled consent of plaintiff City and County of Devern to transfer.
11/21/61	1ed consent of defendant Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp and Upjohn
Co. to transfer. : ®o11/21/84 PFiled consent of defendants American Cyanamid Co., Bristol Myers
: Co., and Chas. Pfizer Co. to transfer.
@®11/22/68 Filed opinion of Panel in additonal cases transferring them toSouthrn District of New York. =F #7	@ ~7 20000 «
12/11/60 11ed motion of defendant American Cyanamid for temporary transfer
of four additional cases to N.Y., S. for pretrial proceedings
| 12/12/68 Entered order to show cause (Schedule C).
| 12/19/68 _ Filed letter from plaintiff in Alpine Pharmacy, Inc., etc., et al.
| €/ vy. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 68 C 1952, Ill., N.| wailving oral argument on transfer motion.
12/20/60 Filed plaintiff Lee's Prescription Shops, Inc., et al. to defendant's
2 &- ;otion for transfer of four additional cases to New York, S. (0+1)
12/30/68" Filed response ot plaintiff Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp., Inc.,
23 Fla., S., 68-1131, Civ. CF. opposing transfer.
1/2/69Y, Filed stipulation by State of South Dakota and Defendants to Transfer] ¥ south Dakota case to the Southern District of New York
1/3/60 8 Filed Defendants reponse to Panel's show cause order C
176/60 ab Filed Defendants' Supplementary statement in response to show cause order.
. i CTE
1/7/69 Filed, order of Panel transferring The State of South Dakota v. Chas.
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., Civil No. 68-104C, to New York, S.,
and to Judge Wyatt.
1/28/69 Order to Show Cause (Schedule D)
1/29/69 Filed hearing order for Cedars of Lebanon Hospital and Lee's Presceiption
Shops cases on February 28, 1969 in Washington, D.C.
1/29/69 Filed obdet of Panel transferring Alpine Pharmac Inc., et al. v. Chas,
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., I1ll., N., No. 68 C 1952, to the southernDistrict of New York and assigned to Judge Wyatt.
1/30/69 Bent Notice of Hearing to counsel (Feb. 28, 1969)
(CONTINUED - NEXT PAGE)

t Hl \ x : ’
2/6/60" Filed Entry of Appearnace and consent tJ transfer respondihg to show cause
od 7 order by plaintiff Christian Hospital of St. Louis, Christian Hospital
Northwest and Park Lane Memorail Hospital. C
2/6/604% = 59 response of plaintiff Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc., et al., to show: X cause order. Plaintiff does not request hearing but does oppose transfer
of case to N.Y., S. :
2/7/60¥ Filed telegram/response to show cause order by Arizona Foundation for Neurology
2-7 and Psychiatry, et al. (No. 6967-PHX) and County of Maricopa (No. 6961-PHX)
opposing transfer.
2/1/63 Filed letter/response to show cause order of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico staing	t2%* no objection to transfer.
2/7/69 417°2 response and supporting memorandum to show cause order of plaintiff @	Beins, d/b/a Waverly Drugs, (No. 6973, Ohio, S.) requesting this case be
set for hearing.
2/10/63 Filed reply to show cause order of plaintiff The Grange Co., Et al., making	#0 objection to transfer for pretrial proceedings. (except class actin questio
2/10/6¥Fi1ed reply of plaintiff Doughboy Industries, Inc., et al., to show cause order
3a making no objection to transfer for pretrial proceedings.but objects to trans
fer for determination of class action question.
2/10/86 Filed reply ot plinaitff St. Luke's Hospital, et al., to show cause order making	& no objection to transfer for pretrial proceedings but objects to transfer for
determination of class action question.
2/10/60 Filed reply of plaintiff Minnesota Fur Foods Cooperative, et al., to show cause
A 4 order making no objection to transfer for pretrial proceedings buf objects to
transfer for determination of class action question. Ir
2/10/6Q¥etter/response to show cause order stating plaintiff The State of South Carolina
@ &in Civil Action No. 68-1078, will not oppose transfer to N.Y., S..
©2/12/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORBER in 5 111. N. cases (Nos. 69 c¢ 179;
69 C 121; 69 C 210; 69+ 215; and 69 C 232) transferring to N.Y., S. @®	and Judge Wyatt.
2/12/60 Filed statements of defendants with respect to responses by eight plaintiffs
37 to Panel's show cause order requesting transfer to N.Y., S. as plaintiffs’
response fails to show sufficient cause opposing transfer.
Pd
*2/13/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in No. 2287, N.C., E., The State of North
Carolina v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al.
&
2/14/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in No. 68-2799, Pa., E., Hawaii Medical
Service Asso. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., (stay ten days ¢	to Judge Wyatt in N.Y., S.
A
2/17/69 Filed HEARING ORDER in certain actions listed on Jan. 28 show cause order
for Feb. 28.
(CONTINUED)

i x
2/18/69 Tiled MINUTE TRANSFER ORDER in ten cases transferring	them to Judge Wyatt
in N.Y., S. Cases are Ky., E. No. 1946; I11., N. No. 68 C 2478;
Mass., No. 68-1193-C; South Carolina No. 68-1078; Hawaii, No. 2935;
Calif., N. No. 50536; Ark., E. No. LR 68C 254; Mo., E. No. 68 C 546(2);
Ohio, S., No. 68-406; and Puerto Rico, No. 869-68. (2/19/60% Filed stipulation of State of Utah v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al.,
Sy for transfer of case No. 50536, Calif., N. to be transferred toNew York, S.
2/25/69 Filed CONDITIONAI TRANSFER ORDER in cases pending in I11l., N. (No. 69 C 179;
69 C 121; 69 C 210; 69 C 215; and 69 C 232) becomes EFFECTIVE today -
filed on Feb. 12, 1969. Notified transferee clerk
2/25/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Case No. 2287, R@€., E. filed on Feb. 13, 1969
becomes EFFECTIVE today. Notified transferee clerk.
2/25/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Case No. 68-2799, Pa., E., filed on Feb. 1 @)1969 becomes EFFECTIVE today. Notifed transferee clerk.
| 2/25/60 Filed Response of Plaintiffs Arizona Foundation for Neurology &
| 3% Psychiatry (No. 6967-PHX) and The County of Maricopa (No.
| 6961-PHX) to Show Cause Order of Jan. 28.
2/26/60N Filed telegram stating Waverly Drugs, v. American Cyanamic (Ohio, S., No. 6973)
Yo offers no further objections and requests case be transferred to Judge
| Wyatt in N.Y., S. immediately.2/26/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring Beins d/b/a Waverly Drugs v. Chas. Pfizer
& Co., Inc., et al., Ohio, S. to Judge Wyatt in New York, S.
| 2/28/69 Filed Motion for transfer of Civil Action No. 1733, The State of Montana& ¢ vv. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. to New York, S.
| 3/3/65™ Filed stipulation signed by plaintiff and defendant American Cyanamid Co.| 4 g.to transfer of State of Montana v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al.,
| No. 1733, Mont. :
| 3/L/60™ Filed sitpulation signed by counsel for all parties consenting to transfer
| ¥ 2 of Civil Action 66 C 640, N.Y., E., Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. v. Generic
| Férmulae, Inc., et al. ®
3/5/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring from N.Y., E. to N.Y., S. and assigining
to Judge Wyatt Civil Action No. 66C 640, Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. Vv.
\ 3/5/69 Filed stipulation signed by plaintiff and defendant Olin Mathieson
4 Chemical Corp. to transfer State of Montana v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.,Inc., et al., No. 1733, Mont.
} 3/6/69 Filed stipulation signed by zzurzzX plaintiff and defendant Bristol
4 4 Myers Co. to transfer State of Montana	V. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.,
et al., No. 1733, Mont- C
3/6/63 Filed stipulation signed by all counsel in Burlington Hospital, et al.
He, Ve Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., for transfer to N.Y., S. and assignedto Judge Wyatt.
(CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)

SE EE
| 3/7/69 Filed stipulation signed by plaintiff and defendant Upjohn Company to
97 transfer State of Montana v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc,, et al., No.	1733, Mont. to N.Y., S. and assigned to Judge Wyatt.
3/11/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring Civil Action 8-23-28-C-1 Burlington @®Hospital, et al. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.,-.et a}. from the Southern
District of Iowa to the Southern District of New York and assigned to
Judge Wyatt. :
®3/12/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in CA No. 42648, Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.
v. Richlyn Laboratories, Inc., Pa., E., transferring to N.Y., S. and .
assigining to Judge Wyatt (Order Stayed Ten Days)
} 3/14/69 Filed stipulation signed by plaintiff and defendant Chas. Pfizer Co. to trans-
4 fer State of Montana v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., No. 1733,Mont., to N.Y., S. and assigned to Judge Wyatt.
3/18/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring State of Montana v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., on
et al., frem Montana to Southern New York and assigned to Judge Wyatt.
® 3/24/69 Filed CONTITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in CA 20578, Rockdale Pharmacy Inc., et al.
v. Chas. Pfiger & Co., Inc., et al., transferring from Md. to N.Y., S.
(Order stayed ten days)
3/24/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in CA 8184, State of Washington, etc. v.
Chas. Pfizer & Co., et al., transferring from Wash., W. to N.Y., S.
(Order stayed ten days) :
® 3/24/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in CA 6559, State of Tennessee v. Chas.
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. transferring from Tenn., E. to N.Y., S.
: (Order stayed ten days) Co
3/25/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FILED on March 12 in Richlyn Laboratories Case
: elapsed today. Notified transferee clerk transfer now effective. .
: 3/26/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Case No. 51010, Calif., N., Teamsters
Security Fund of Northern California, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.,
et al.,
4/2/69 Entered EXTENSION OF TIME in CA 8184, State of Wash. v. Pfizer, Wash., W.;
CA 6559, State of Tenn. v. Pfizer, Temn., E.; and CA 20578, Rodkdale
Phramacy v. Pfizer, Md., extending until April 14 time for responding ®	to conditional transfer orders entered on March 24, 1969.
® 14/3/69 Filed OPINION AND ORDER transferring@Ocases from U4 different district
courts to the Southern District of New York and assigning them to
Judge Inzer B. Wyatt for coordinated or consolidated pretrial pro-
ceedings (per curiam opinion).
4/7/69 Filed plaintiffs' Peterson's Pharmacy, Inc., et al. v. Pfizer (Minn., C.A.
$9 h-69 Civ. 44) Motion to Transfer, Notice of Motion, & Certificate of	Service
® 4/7/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Marvin Barkal, etc. v. Chas. Pfizer ®& Co., Inc., et al., (Ill., N., C.A. 69 C 647).
ol/8/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Peterson's Pharmacy v. Pfizer, Minn.,
CA No. 4-69 Civ. 4b,

4/14/69 Filed Motion and Memorandum of plaintiff opposing to conditional, transfer order
SY filed 5/24/69 in CA 8184, State of Washington	v. Chas. Pfizer ,
®4/14/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Mario de Modeno, etc. Vv. Cha. Pfizer & Co.,
Inc., et. al., (Calif, Central Civil No. 69-260-CC)." =.
4/14/69 Filed extension of time in State of Washington case in which conditional ®	transfer order was entered on March 24, 1969.
4/14/69 CONDITION TRANSFER ORDER IN CASE No. 6559 Tenn., E. filed on March 24, 1969
becomes EFFECTIVE today. Notified transferee clerk.
4/14/69 CONTITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Case No. 20578, Marylandfiled on March 24, 1969
becomes EFFECTIVE today. Notified transferee clerk.
4/17/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER IN CASE No. 69 C 647 filed on April 7, 1969
becomes EFFECTIVE today. Notified transferee clerk.
4/18/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in No. 4-69 Civ. 44, Minnesota, filed on April 8 C	becomes effective today. Notified transferee clerk.
4/18/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER IN No.69-687 Sun Ray Drug Company et al.
v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. et al. (E. of Pa. to S. N.Y. )
@4/18/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in No. 130-69 Weiwall Drug Co. et al.
() v. Chas. Pfizer Co., Inc. et al. (Dis. of Puerto Rico to S. N.Y.)
4/2L4/69* Filed Defendants' Memorandum in Response to the State of Washington's (C.A.
| e] ) No. 8184, Wash., W.) Motion Opposing Consolidation.
4/25/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in C.A. 69-260-CC (calif., C.) Mario de Modeno
effective today. Notified transferee clerk.
4/28/63 Filed ltr fr plaintiff State of Washington in C.A. No. 8184
& 2 (Wash. W.) requesting hearing before Panel.
: 5/2/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Weiwall Drug Co. (No. 130-69, P.R.) became
effective. Notified transferee clerk.
5/2/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER In Sun Ray Durg Co. (Pa., E., No. 69-687)
. became effective. Notified transferee clerk.(*)4/23/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in State of Nebraska (Nebr., No. 1513L)
5/2769 NOTICE OF HEARING mailed to all counsel re; State of Washington etc. Vv. ®Chas Pfizer & Co., et al. C.A. 8184 for Denber May 23, 1065 meeting
5/6/60 Filed Plaintiff's reply to Defendants' memorandum in Resepnse to the state
£3 of Washington's motion opposing consolidation. State of Washington, Etc.	v. Chas Pfizer & Co., et al.
5/6/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in State of Nebraska (Nebr., No. 1513L)
became effective. Notified TransTeree clerk.
5/7/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring Midwest Veterinatyr Supply (Minn., @®	No. 4-69 C 75) to N.Y., S.
5/14/59 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Ark. W. No. ED-69-C-8 Jack England
et al. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. et al.
5/14/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER IN Wash. W. No. 822 Group Health @coop. of

5/14/69* Filed stipulation signed by all counsel in State of Alaska Case (No., J-2-69)
SY for transfer to New York, S. ) - 5 . tL
5/21/69 Entered CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in The Kansas Hospital Asso. v. Pfizer,
Kansas, No. T-4560, Co tT :
5/21/69 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring State of Alaska, etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & ‘4	Inc., et al., from Alaska (No. J-2-69 Civil) to N.Y., S.
5/23/60 eed Motion and Memorandum to Vacate Transfer Order in Group Health Cooperativ	| g ef Puget Sound v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., Case No. 8222, Wash. ,W.
5/26/69 Filed order of Panel staying execution of transfer order entered on May 14
in C.A. 8222, Wash., W., Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound v. Pfizer
5/26/69. geile Motion and Brief to Vacate Transfer Order of 5/14 in Jack England
case, No. ED-69-C-8, Ark., W. C
5/26/69 Filed order of Panel staying execution of transfer order entered on May 14
in C.A. ED-69-C-8, Ark., W., Jack England, et al. v. Pfizer.
6/3/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in C.A. T-4560, Kansas Hosp. Asso. v. Pfizer,
Kansas, effective today. Notified transferee clerk.
6/4/Q% Filed letter of plaintiff in Group Health Cooperative Case waiwing further| 7 hearing and stating reliance on documents already submitted.
6/6/60,, Filed Defendants’ memo responding to Motion of Group Health Cooperative of
58 Puget Sound Opposing Transfer-
6/6/69 Filed Defendants' Memo in Opposition to Motion 6f Jack England, et al., to
$7 Vacate Order of Transfer to the Southern District of New Yor,.
6/11/69N Filed Supplemental Brief of plaintiff Jack England supporting motion to
& © vacate transfer order.
6/16/69 Filed stipulation of all parties to transfer of City of Kansas City, Mo. v.
& / Chas. Pfizer
6/20/69 Filed Hearing Order setting for 9:30 a.m. on July 25 in Denver to hear C	opposition to Jack England Case (Ark., W., No. ED-69-C-8
6£20/69 Filed order transferring City of Kansas City, Mo. v. Pfizer case to N.Y., S.
on stipulation of all parties.
6/25/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER In Building Service Union Health & Welfare
Fund V. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Calfilornia, N., No. 51523
6/25/69 Filed stipulated transfer order in City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Chas.
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., Missouri, W., No. 17465
7/8/69 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER IN C.A. No. 51523 (Building Service Union (	Health & Welfare Trust Fund) California, N. effective today. Notified
transferee clerk.
®7/9/6§ Filed OPINION AND ORDER (per curiam) lifting stays in State of WashingtonCase and Group ‘Health Cooperative Cases and ordering transfer to N.Y., S.
7/16 /69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER in Bernard and Mark Lachman, et al., v.
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Md., Civ. No. 20971

. 4 oy
- DOCKET NO. 10 - MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST INVOLVING ANTIBIOTIC x.
oo DRUGS . N '
D. C. 110A Rev. Civil Docket Continuation ®
to ' Date Order or
DATE | , x PROCEEDINGS JudgmentNoted	0 ______=
8/4/69 CONDITIONAL: TRANSFER ORDER IN C.A. No. 20971 (Bernard and Mark
Lachman, et al., v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Maryland) effectiv
: today. Notified transferee clerk.
8/6/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER In Edwards Brothers Milling Co.,
: Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., North Carolina, E.,
\ No. 23728/6/62 -, Filed ltr dtd. 7/11/69 advising error in opinion as to counsel for	£. State of Washington case and the Group Health Cooperative Case.
[ 8/7/69 |Filed order CORRECTENG 0&0 as to p. 2 footnote referring to counsel	for State of Washington and Group Health Cooperative Cases.
8/19/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER In Edwards Brother Milling Co., .
Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., North Carolina, E.;j
| No. 2372. Notified transferee clerk.
| 8/21/69 P| Filed OPINION AND ORDER lifting stay on May 14 conditional transfer
| order in Jack England Case, Ark., W., No. ED-69-8 and ordering
| transfer of said case to New York, S. (Per Curiam) |	|
| 8/26/ Filed STIPULATION signed by counsel for def. and pl. agreeing that	| a Case No. 17640-4, Missouri Farmers Asso., Inc., et al. v. Chas.
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., should be transferred	to N.Y., S. p
| 8/27/69 Filed CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER IN C.A. NOS. IP-69-C-366, Lester
Cronley, etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., Ind., S.,
Ralph Pfau d/b/a Victor Pharmacy, et al. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.,
Inc., et al Ind., S. IP-69-C-367 and A69-CA-108, Burgess Poultry
Market, Inc., et al. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. et al., Texas, .
9/4/69 Missouri Farmers Asso., Inc., et al. v. Pfizer, Mo., W., No. 17640-4
MINUTE ORDER ENTERED TRANSFERRING CASE TO N.Y., S.
9/8/69 |Filed Motion of defendants (w/supporting brief) to transfer UNITED
GY STATES OF AMERICA V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL. from D.C.
(No. 1966-69) to New York, Southern.
9/9/69 Burgess Poultry Market, Inc., et al. v. Pfizer., et al., Tex., W. NoLA69-CA-10§
Lester Cronley, etc. v. Pfizer, et al., Ind., S., No. IP-69-C-366
Ralph Pfau d/b/a Victor Pharmacy, et al. v. Pfizer, et al., Ind., S.
No. IP-69-C-367
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE| CLERK
9/17/69 Northwest Hos. Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. , No. 69 C 1859 Ill., N
C CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED TODAY
9/22/69). Filed pl. United States Brief (w/Exhibits) in Opposition to Motion fpr@s transfer of C.A. 1966-69 (D. C.)

DATE | PROCEEDINGS : oo Totamont Noted
SINE	I
9/24/69 Sol S. Turnoff Drug Dis. v. American Cyanamid Co., Pa., E., No. hg
69-1885. CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDEP ENTERED TODAY.
9/29/69 | United States v. Pfizer, et al., D.C., C.A. No. 1966-69 |
Extension of time to file briefs in reply to opposition to transfer.
9/30/69| Northwest Hospital, Inc. v. Pfizer, Ill., N., No. 69C 1859 ’
| C.T.O. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK.
10/1/69| Haverford Hos. Corp., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al
Penn., E., No. 69-2249. CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. ENTERED Qo	TODAY ’
10/1/69| Immanuel, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al Neb., No. 03373
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED TODAY
10/7/69 |* Sol ,§. Turnoff Drug Dist. Inc., et al v. Amer. Cyan. Co., Pa., E.
No. 69-1885. CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER EFFECTIVE TODAY
10/9/69 | Washington State Hos. Ass., et al v. Chas. Pfi-er & Co., Inc. etal
No. 8539. CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED TODAY
| 10/9/69 The Anderson Cattle Co., et al v. Amer. Cyan. Co., et al, Kansas
| [7 No. T-4659. Filed Stipulation of all parties for transfer to| New York, Southern :
10/9/60 Filed Defendant's Brief in Reply to Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition
| C7 to transfer of U. S. v. Pfizer (D.C.) :
10/14/69 Haverford Hos. Corp., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al Pa.,
| E., No. 69-2249. C.T.O. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE
CLERK
: 10/14/69| Immanuel, Inc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al Nebr., No. 03373
C.T.0. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK ®
| 10/16/69 Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. v. Pfizer, Calif., N. No. 52342CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED: SENT TO ALL COUNSELAND JUDGE
| 10/28/69| Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. v. Pfizer, Calif., N. No. 52342C.T.O. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK
11/3/69 |Wash. State Hosp. Asso., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al,
Wash., W., Civil Action No. 8539. C.T.O. EFFECTIVE TODAY.
NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK*
11/12/69 | Entered hearing order for 12/8 in Philadelphia for U.S. v. Pfizer,
D.C., CA No. 1966-69. :
4011/13/69 | Mailed NOTICE OF HEARING to counsel in U.S. v. Pfizer (w/Rules of
Procedure) for 12/8 in Philadelphia, (SENT TO ALL COUNSEL IN JP-10)
*The .order should have become effective 10/20/69

12/3/69 A. C. Smith Poultry Co., ete. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, €a., N., te
No. '1293: CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND
JUDGES - :
12/12/69 Rutledge Ranch etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al; Alba., N., No. 69-766
" Guy J. Phelps, Jr. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Alba., N., No. 69-767
" Kenneth Murray Co. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Alba., N., No. 69-765 (i)	CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND JUDGES i:
12/16/69 A. C. Smith Poultry Co., etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., er et al, Ga., N.	No.1293. C.T.0. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREF CLERK :
12/23/69 Rutledge Ranch etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Alba., W., No. 69-766
12/23/69 Guy J. Phelps, Jr. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Alba., N., No. 69-767
12/23/69 Kenneth Murray Co. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Alba., N., No. 69-768
C.T.O. EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOFITIED TRANSFEREE CLERK
12/31/69 INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP., ET AL. V. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., ET AL.,
CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to All Counsel and Involved Judges. @®
1/8/98 Filed ORDER denying request of Pfizer to participate and submi brief to Panelin U.S. v. Pfizer (D.C., No. 1966-69)
1/13/70 INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIED CORP., ET AL. V. AMER. CYANAMID CO., ET AL.,
CTO ELAPSED TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES.
1416/70 DR. E. J. HOFFERT, V. AMERICAN CYANAMID, Minn., No. 4-69 Civil 458
CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to All Counsel and Involved Judges.
1/23/70 SYLVAN ACRES INC., ET AL. V. CHAS, PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL., Ill., N. 70 C 39
CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to All Counsel and Involved Judges.
1/27/70 DR. E. J. HOFFERT V. AM. CYANAMID, Minn., No. 4-69 Civil 458
CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES.
1/30/70 U. S. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., /INC., ET AL., D.C., No. 1966-69: Opinion and Order entered today transferring Counts II and III to the S.D.
New York and assigning same to Judge Wyatt. Count I is trans-ferring
| and immediately remanded to the District of Columbia.
2/4/70 SYLVAN ACRES INC., ET AL. V. CHAS. PFIZER & XO., INC., ET AL., ILL., N. 70 C 39
CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. /NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES.
| | / .
2/5/70 MARSHALL DURBIN FOOD CORP. , ET AL V. CHAS PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL, ®| ALA., M., NO. 3015-N. CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to All Counsel and
Involved Judges.
2/5/70 THE NATIONAL FARMERS' ORGANIZATION INC., ET AL V. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., ET AL
| OHIO, S., NO. 7398. CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to All Counsel and Involved
| Judges.
2/17/70 MARSHALL DURBIN FOOD CORP., ET AL V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL,
: ALA., M., NO. 3015-N CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK
AND INVOLVED JUDGES
2/17/70 THE NATIONAL FARMERS' ORGANIZATION INC., ET AL. V. AMERICAN CYANAMID ®: CcO., ET AL, OHIO, S., NO. 7398 CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY NOTIFIED
TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES -
12/20/70 THE REP. OF VIET-NAM V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL, ILL., N., NO. 70 C 299
CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to all Counsel and Involved Judges

3/2/70 RICHARD X. CONNORS ET AL, V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL VIR., E.,
NO. 70-70-23 , d
3/2/70 ASSOCEZATED:	LIFE INSURANCE CO. ETC. V. CHAS. .PFIZER.& CO., INC., et al
Ill., N., No. 70 C 368 CTO ENTERED TODAY. Sent to all Counsel
and Involved Judges
3/3/70 THE REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., et al, I1Il11l., N.,
No. 70 C 299 CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND ®	INVOLVED JUDGES
3/13/70 RICHARD X. CONNORS,ET AL V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., Inc., et al, Vir.,
E., No. 70-70-A CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND
INVOLVED JUDGES 2
3/13/70 ASSOCIATED LIFE INSURANCE CO. Etc. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et ai, .
I1l., N., No. 70 C 368 (CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK
AND INVOLVED JDUGES -
3/17/70 CARL F. DODGE ETC. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., et al, I1l., N., No. 70 C 500
CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES C
3/30/70 CARL F. DODGE ETC. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., et al, I1ll., N., No. 70 C 500
CT® EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUBGES
4/3/70 THRIFTY DRUG CO., INC., et al v. Chas Pfizer& Co., Inc., et al, Calif.,
£., No. 70-502AAH. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND #NVOLVED JUDGES
4/3/70 MALCOLM~-GREGG CO., INC., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Calif., N.,
No. C-70- 613. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
4/7/70¥ LEY ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND CONSENT TO TRANSFER by pl. Bernard Kay, et al.	| &§ v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., S.D. Ohio, CA. No. 70-76
4/7/70 Filed MINUTE ORDER transferring Kay v. Pfizer to S.D. N.Y. and assignment
to Judge. Wyatt.
4/13/70 MALCOLM-GREEG CO., INC., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Calif.,
: N., No. C-70-613 CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND
| INVOLVED JUDGES
4/13/70 THRIFTY DRUG CO., INC., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, Calif., C.,
: No. 70-502AAH CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED
| JUDGES
| 6/15/70 TEE FRENCH HOSPITAL OF L.A., ET AL, V. CHARLES PFIZER & CO., INC., ET = @| Calif., C.A. No. 70-1101-IH. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND
| INVOLVED JUDGES
| 6/16/70 MOTION TO TRANSFER in French Hospital of L.A., et al. v. Pfizer, C.D. Cal.,
| (<9) No. 70-1101-IH. by plaintiffs.
6/26/70 THE FRENCH HOSPITAL OF L.A., ET AL, V. CHAR. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL,
| Calif., C.A. No. 70-1101-IH. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFEED TRANSFEREE
| CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES.
7/7/70 VALLEY CLERKS TRUST FUND, V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL, N.D. carte ly| No. C-70-1294LHB
| SAN FRANCISCO CULINARY, BARTENDERS & SERVICE EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND, V.
| . CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL, N.D. CALIF., No. C-70-1295ACW
| CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
|

: Ee
A Ad [3 [3
\ - ’ . + * . "
© "D. C. 110 Rev. Civil Docket Continuation EE. s
. : Co rT ) Date Order or
DATE ’ PROCEEDINGS Judgment Noted
20/70 |VALLEY CLERKS TRUST FUND V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., et al, —! ooN.D. CALIF., No. C-70-1294LHB- SAN FRANCISCO CULINARY, BAR- eo
” ~ | TENDERS '& SERVICE EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND V. CHAS. PFIZER	& CO., |
~~|] INC., ET AL, N.D. CALIF., NO.C-70-1295ACW.	CTO EFFECTIVE	TODAY |
"NOTIFIEDTRANSFEREE	CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES TTT
8/14770 | RETAIL CLERKS LOCAL 770 § FOOD EMP. BENEFIT FUND., ET AL. V. CHAS.
~~ PFIZER & CO., INC., ET AL., N.D. CALIF., No. C-70-1681 ACW
- BAKERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND.,	ET AL. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC.,
i} ET AL., N.D. CALIF. No.C-70-1680	ACW CTO ENTERED TODAY- SENT
NB ~TO ALL COUNSEL ANDINVOLVED	JUDGES
8/25/70 | BAKERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et
al, N.D. calif., No. C-70-1680ACW... -
RETAIL CLERKS LOCAL 770 and FOOD EMPLOYERS BENEFIT FUND, et al, v.
BE ~ Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., N.D. €alif., No. C-70-1681 ACW
"TO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND INVOLVED JUDGES
10 70 Motion by Plaintiffs' National Steering Committee to Transfer to the
7 = District	of Minnesota; Brief of Cettain Farm Plaintiffs, Misc. Plls
& United States; Brief of Certain Government Plaintiffs;	Ltr fron
TT certain pl's asking for expedited hearing on motion.
10 0) Motion to Transfer Government Cases to a Separate Judge Db :
tates of California, Kansas & N.C, , SE
10/8/70)| Ltr. of def. Pfizer, American Cyanamid, Bristol-Myers, Upjohn & Squibb a
~~ 7% Beech-Nut,	and Olin Corp. for hearing on question of new judge. :
10/13/70%vK3Brief of Aetna Life Insurance Co. Opposing Motion. _
(®) 10 0 | Notice of Hearing mailed to all counsel
0/16/78 P%Defs. joint memoradum inopposition to motions by certain Pls. for
urther transfer or transfers of certain actions.
* ATEidavit o ervice
0-26-70| Certificate of Service for brief of pl. Edwards Bros. Milling Co., Inc.
(*)10/22/70 Filings at Hearing in Boston: 1) Ltr. fr Pl. N. C. counsel stating
7 views on consolidation.
77? 2 Pls! Joint Reply Memo i}
JS (3) Erratum Correction of Defs' Joint Memorandum
WW 72 (4) Brief of Edwards Bros., Inc. in Support of Motion
xX 5) Exhibit 1 of Pls' National Steering Committee i _
4Y¥| Joinder in Motion by Pls. National Steering Comm. for transfer to the
4 District of Minnesota
11/9/70) Ltr. fr. Scanlon (pl.s) dtd. 11/6 re: Motion to remand and transfer [of
dd. non-setlg. cases to Minn. ]
11/16/70 | LOUISIANA HATCHERIES, INC., et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al
E.D. La., No. 70-3000. 6€TO+*ERPERER	TODAY: Sent: Counsel of Record
and involved judges.
3 y .D. La., No. 0-3000. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE
0 CTO ENTERED TODAY IN LOUISIANA HATCHERIES CASE sent to Defense .
Counsel and Involved Judges. TT
(*) 10/2/70 | HEARING ORDER sent to involved Judges and Clerks.
a

DATE | PROCEEDINGS . Co Ensoa kL
12/2/70 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE in Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound v.
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, No.-	69 Civ. 3195 AND
California Physicians" Service v. Chasggpfizer & Co., Inc., et
- al, No. 69 Civ. 4746. Sent to Defensdl Counsel and Involved Judges. .
12/2/70»|Consent of Chief Judge Sugarman to assignment of non-settlment cases
i "ta. Judge Lord.
12/2/70N Stipulation of Pltf's Nat'l Steering Comm. & Liaison Counsel fo :
X Defendants as to changes in transcript o 0 0_hearing
' 12/2/70 Op IN] aN ANP—ORD R ceassigning NOoON—Settc Rave rases OO J110 Ce Mi es LO rl
oo Minn n_So hexrn Distr] EO New ork ota 0 58 actions
are subie o_this order. Copies to all counsel, dges Wyatt
- ord and Sugarman. Panel Judges, Publishers & Transferee Clerk 4
12/8/70 AMENDED ORDER correcting the opinion and order filed on Dec. 2, 1970
in the Antibiotic Drug Litigation.
12/10/70%| Motion for assignment to Judge Lord of Group Health Cooperative of
2 Lf Puget Sound v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al, No. 69 Civ 3195
12718770
al, E.b. La., No. 70-3000. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSHEREE
12/23/70
— 69 Civ. 4746, 5.D. N.Y. to Judge Milesi%. Order sént to transfere¢ clerk,
1/19/71
XS] 68 Civ. 240) and Hartford Hospital Case (No, 69 Civ, 755) from Judge
Wyatt to Judge Lord. gyupnerting Memoranda
1/29/71 | -Order denying Asso'd Life Ins 0. motion to transfer hearing and gssign
motion O dge Lord o movant attorne jaison counsel, to
1/29 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Motion of Assoc. Life Ins. Co. to transfer
3/7™ | Motion w/brief of Defendants to Remand International Rectifier Caselto C.D.
Xe | california	0]
eo]
57 | C.D. CALIF., CIVIL ACTION NO. 69-2482-HP. Plaintiffs Motion (with Brief),
~oppoéition to remand the International Rectifier Case £0 the Central Distrige ©
-
55 | Civil Action No. 69-2482-HP. Plaintiffs’ request for extension OF [time gy
3/3/71
Civil Action No. 69-2482 HP. Entered order granting extension.” 3K3/	|
EE
I.

) . “© e-
rg ! | r . . R ) ; ik .Zp . .
co -
3 _ -
oo . .
P- “ - B . Cn .
RD :
Date Qa . .
3/10/71N ¥¥9 IAMERICAN CYANAMID CO. V. RACHELLE LABORATORIES, INC... BXRXNXXXXXSxSXXXXU
| | (c.D. calif No. 70-521-JWC) Defendant's motion and b Le: 0 ansfe —
| J to S.D. New York for coordinated ®r cénsolidated pretrial proceeding
|| INTERNATIONAL R R CORP AMERICAN ANAMID DD 0 Civ 180
| J (C.D. calif, 69-2484HP) - ORDER denying defends motion to remand
| Sent to counsel, and involved judges.
1/77 1% lamerTCOAN ANAMID CO RACH ABORATORIES., (70=721=JWC) C.D.Cal.
a Ae 1 al anamid -— 0 = 0 2X 1 ion OO ime » | - £2 alada =
|] and brie in opposition a defendant! mation 0 an = a DD
|] Order entered extending time to and including April 5, 1971.
J Notified counsel (Non-SOtEling)	-deeedssed—iwmes.	|
3/30477 |7/} AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. V. RACHELLE LAB., INC., (71-242-JWC) C.D.CALIF
[ Defendant memo of points and authorities in support of motion to
- transfer . Defendant's Motion to Transfer.	3/39/71 73| PLAINTIFF AMERICAN CYANAMID's brief in Opposition to Motion to
|_| Transfer C.D. Cal. Action No. 70-#21-JWC to S.D. N.Y.
4. 1 2A] Request of pl, American Cyanamid D al, 71-242-JW o respond to
hd otion to transfer to & incl, Apri 0 971
4/6/71 |J ORDER (ranting to & incl. 4/19/71 for American Cyanamid to respond in
op ] c.D, Cal. 71-242-JWC
_XxxxXFE ‘4/4/71 Reply Brief of Defendant Rachelle Laboratories (C.D. Cal., No. 70-521-JWC)
4/19/71N |< AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. V. RACHALLE LAB., INC., (C.D.CALIF. 71-242-JWC
| | Plaintiffs brief in opposition to motion to transfer.
4/21/71 | AMERICAN CYANAMID CO RACE ARORATORIES Ne C.D,CALIF, 70-521-JWC
|J AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. V. RACHELLE LAB., C.D. CALIF... 71-242-J
| | HEARING ORDER entered setting for May 26, 1971 Washington, D
5/6/71 S| AMERICAN CYANAMID 0 RACH ABQRATOR ND. CAT, =242-TWC
ad Regque for extension Oo Ma 0 9 om Rache e aharatorie
| 1 order entered extending Rachelle Labaratorie ime to ile and serve
] brief 0 and in ding Ma 0 9 230 a pnlainti Olnse and
Defendan Qunse
5/6/71 | 97 |AMERICAN CYANAMID CQ RACH AR D CALIE 71-2421
| | Defendant's reply brief to motion to transfe
2 1 AMER AN MEANAMID 0 RA $ AB yD CAL Oe Ih	| I aveRTcaN cvananip co. Vv. RACHELLE TA.B., "oc pn cal., 71-242-quc |
1] Opinion and Orde an o ing O DD dae ard
8/16/71 | 1 E.J. HOFFERT V. AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-69-458 70 Civ. 367
|1 GRANGE CO. V. AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-68-411 69 Civ. 1556
|| DOUGHBOY IND., INC. V. AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-69-4009 69 Civ. 1558
|| MINN. FUR FOODS COOPERATIVE V. AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-68-410 69 Civ, 1559
|| MIDWEST VETERINARY SUPPLY V, AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-69- 69 Civ. 1557
| MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO. V. AM. CYANAMID, MINN 4-71-6 7 iv _570
|] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why these cases should not be trans. to Minn.
] entered today. Sent to Nonsettling counsel.
8/26/71 9A1 E.J. HOFFERT, THE GRANGE CO., DOUBHBOY, MINN, FUR FOODS COOPERATIVE
a Cases — Plaintiffs consent for transfer to Minnesota
8/30 169 Vurnuesr vererinaRy cuppry MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO., Wl
a Plaintiffs consent for transfer to Minnesota
—WA EE |) prizer-FNe uw. REVION Nes EP C2 7 E ° wil T4
|| eT enrerct—todey.— Notified counsel —irvelvediudeos
x AN NS NS AL AK KT Lo
EE VA	4 — :
|] )

J .
, . * - ) s
DATE | PROCEEDINGS Joaod3727774 (ITO) INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP. AND RACHELLE LABORATORIES, INC. 4
TT reply brief w/cert. of service and ex ibits.
1/74 PFIZER, - V. CORP C~ 5 CALIF., 74-353-RJR
—_— XING ORDER ~- setting action for hearing on April 26, 1974
i Washington, D. C. :
8/15/744°SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF PFIZER, INC., re Pfizer v. International
Rectifier Corp., et al., w/certificate of service
8/28/74 (1112) INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP. supplemental memorandum to Pfizer |Inc.
- 10 4 4 P R RE 0 C.D.CAL, CV-74-1927-LTL
|
0 /
|___ CTO final today. Notified transfere clerk, judge, involved judges clerk
) C.D. Calif., CV-74-353-RJK ~~ transferring action to
D. Minn. for coordinated or consolidated pretrial
3 proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1407
12/12/74 | LEO GABOW V. CHAS PFIZER & CO., N.D.CAL., C74-2492-RFP
CTO entered today. Notified counsel, involved judges.
6/74] _spaIN V. PFIZER, INC., D. D.C., 74-1746 |
| 0/74 0 GABQW HAS P R & CO N.D.CAI 4-2492 RFP
O ina ada Notified an eree erk invo ed Judges
| NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO CTO from defts filed today. Order automaticall
4 D Mace Gazda v. Charles Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al., N.D.I11 73C34p
MO @N ‘AND BR o vacate (SPAIN, COLOMBIA AND KOREA) CTOs filed by
1/3 | OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO VACATE CTO -~- Pltfs. Federal Republic of German
2/3/75
3/5/75
| March 21, 1975, Dallas, Texas	|	§
4/8/75
ee
NS	Ns	RN

) v LA.
.. PI ‘ ‘ RT
s A . . . A
D. C."110 Rev. Civil Docket Continuation } oo eo
DATE PROCEEDINGS eo ated
C 9/27/71 DR. E.J. HOFFERT V. AM.CYANAMID, ET AL.S.D.N.Y. 70Civ.	367 |	_GRANGE	CO. V. AM.CYANAMID, S.D.N.Y. 69 Civ. 1556 —
DOUGHBOY IND., INC. V. AM. CYANAMID S.D.N.Y. 69 Civ. 1558
~~ |MINN.	FUR FOORS V. AM. CYANAMID, S.D.N.Y¥. 69 Civ. 1559 —
MIDWEST VETERINARY V. AM. CYANAMID, S.D.N.Y.	69 Civ. 1557 ]
“MUTUAL OF OMAHA V. AM. SYCNAMID, S.D.N.Y. 71 Civ. 570 )
: ~~ REMAND ORDER remanding to the District of Minnesota. Sent
- to Clerk S.D.N.Y. copy to Clerk, D. Minn., Judge Wyatt and
_ Judge Lord. Copy of order to involved counsel. oo
11/1/71 L., I.EDELSON, ET. AL.	V. CHAS. PFIZER & co., INC., ET AL., W.D.PA. 71-589
_ SHOW CAUSE ORDER entered today. Sent to copnsels involved fiat oo	11/10/71'L.I. EDELSON, ET AL. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., W.D. PA., 71-589
0 Letter response from counsel for plaintiff advising no objectio ~
to transfer to Minn. for pretrial proceedings.
2/7/72 Consent of Chief Judge Devitt for assignment of action to Judge Lord
in theDistrict of Minneapolis
2/7/72 ...I. EDELSON, ET AL. V. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., ET AL., W.D. PA.,71-589 |
Transfer Order -transferring	to D. Minn pursuant to 28 U.S.C.8§1407
i Notified involved judged, clerks and counsel oo
4/14/72 REPUBLIC OF HE -PHTLH N PFIZER, ETAL,
D. C. 650-72	= ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTEREBD—FPOPAY-—— Notified Judge
J and covnselt.OO
5/5/72 REPUBLIC OF PHILLIPINES V. PFIZER, ET AL., D.C., No. 650-72. Tir.
j dtd. 4/28/72 fr. plaintiff advising no opposition to consolidation
5/22/72 REPUBLIC OF PHILLIPINES V. PFIZER, ET AL., D.C., No. 650-72
Transfer order - transferring to D. Minn pursuant to 28 U.S.C §1407
Notified involved judges, clerks and counsel LL
7-}-73 ~ |PFIZER, INC. V. INTL. RECTIFIER CORP., ET AL., .D. A . =58=R
bd EL. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP. AND RA H ABORATOR MOTION,
Brief, Affidavits, and Exhibits to transrer action 0 S.D.N.Y.
276773 PFIZER, ING V. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP. AND RACHELLE LABORATORIESHEARING ORDER - Set Feb. 23, 1973, Washington, D.C.
27%/73, VY|INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORP AND RACHELL LAB. AMENDED certificate of
a service. - oo
2/14/73 [USV_PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. joining in motion to transfer Pfizer v. Intl.
y 93 Rectifier, C.C. Cal, C73-58-R.
72% 2/14/7NPFIZER's Brief in opposition to motion to transfer C.D. Calif. actio
| 2/21/73 International Rectifier Corp. and Rachelle Lab. reply brief to
SOE motion to transfer, exhibits, cert. of service.
SO ~ ||P R letter regarding additional matters (FILED IN OPEN COURT
3/12/73 BFIZERS V. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER	CORP. AND RACHELLE LABURZ TORIES -
C.D. CALIF-, C-73-58-R TL
OPINION AND ORDER transferring action rrom C.D. Ld Sto be
- for coordinated dr consolidated pretrialcproceedingsS pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §1407. Distribution made. Pd
ky 74-3A-RJk - Motion o Tnternational Rectifier and Rachaelle
y 1 fo transfer action to D. Minn. for coordinated or conso.ldated ]
3/25/78 [go] PFIZER response to motion w/cert. of service — — — = 7]

~N
rd + . . » -
£0
5» . =	o
0
RY
Date «QQ
2 |__| TETTER —- From Counsel in the D.C. Toreign actions Yer current
[ developments dated 2 6
9/8/75 |1 LETTER -- Counsel for Chas Pfizer in Foreing Actions informing of
[ resent developments and stating a desire to transfer
| the foreign actions in this litigation to the District of
] Columbia
9/15/75 | | LETTER -- EBXXKX Counsel for foreign plaintiffs on a of action
co DA TN p RD. D 4—-1746
1] Letter from ounse 0 colombia and Korea xu dismiss Oo nain
|] axtion attached.
6 | Ico 0 QLOMBIA p R, D. D KXXEEXE 4~174
BL OF KOREA p R, D. D 4-1748
a ignmen 0 age ord nae o §140
11/2/77 1 J ORDER _-- REASSIGNING LITIGATION TO JUDGE CHARLES R. WEINER OF E. PA.
— sitting by designation in the District of Minnesota pursuant to	28 U.S.C. §292(b effective 10/24/77) Notified TNVO D 1dges
] al ounsel and clerk
1|
]
In ] rs oo ro. ) , CL BE
LC] 7 77 = - 7 - - -
]
|
| —
|]
1
]
]
|
Is
|]
|]
fr	—————
|]
]
| |
]
|
]
P|
|]
I
]
rr	————————
|
|]
]
|
]
— |

i : | 10
oe _ DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION |
. , . , . . ‘ __
9 : DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 10 - MULTIBISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING ANTIBIOTIC DRUG
7/4 Nal Scere
TRANS. To alive	h BY Loe),oD§ HH) SAEi Date | Diftrict ]
No. Caption Filed Court Judge D.C. No.
A- State of Alabama vy. Chas. Pfizer &
cCo., et al. AB rrr irene, 7 i N.Y., Ss. | 68 Civ1099
@:: City of New York v. PfizerX	(2 > ANN 24 64 C 1742	a3 | State of Florida v. PEizervoZegerel ALA | 67 c 1143
A-4 fj State of Illinois v. Pfizer Firrt , 2D - 0 68 C 273
«a5 | State of Louisiana v. Pfizer¥o@ssme boos XI 52 l 68 Cc 1380
'A-6 | City of Memphis v. Pfizerafzg— ee NPP TO § 68 C 1807
“A-7 | State of Minnesota v. Pfizer Xz deo ¥T 2" 68 C 735
'A-8 | state of Mississippi v. Pfizer Car Va | 68 C 1625'A-9 | State of North Dakota v. Pfizery. Z<pfurm Zod] 7A 68 C 1626A-10 f State of Oregon v. Pfizer TAN N Gog 68 C 2370
A-11 | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Vv. PI¥ZCHRY Et | 68 C 1212
A-12 | state of New York v. Pfizer	2& NN 2 ". : J 68 C 845A-13 | State of West Virginia v. Pfizer XC CC " _, — 1 68 C 240
A-14 | state of Wisconsin v. Pfizer2& yg 23 68 C 91A-15 | State of Ohio v. Pfizer \F D7 ¥ 1 68 C 2019'A-16 | state of Indiana v. PfizerR " | 68 C 3157
A-17 J City of Philadelphia & City of—Betroid > 2 Fe }
ve. pfizer 3K 2 2 P¥., E. . C.A.686144
A-18 | Fort Pierce, Florida, General Hosp. AY :
Deborah Hosp. v. Pfizer E22 = / 4 / } C.A.68-452	A-19'WEidney Hillman Labor Council v. Pfizer o> ZZ = 2 ko 4 § C.A.68-162
A-20 | Kent bh ofasonliege v./Boizer J } C.A.68-384AL = 2 | 3
A-21 city #% BgstanLe® { " Mass... J § 3 § 68-105-G
@ = Commonwgslbh ode Wags iysetts v. Pfizep " J 68-116-G	7s us
A-23 | city of Baltimore v. Pfizer ! NY pi. we )4 68C 758	A-24 | State of Maryland v. Pfizer¥ 7 C2 ASL 68C 757
A-25 | State of New Mexico v. Pfizer p 2 " oF. og 68C 822
A-26 | Cotler Drugs, et al. v. Pfizer ) ak ~ _ . 68C 220A-27 | State of Connecticut v. Pfizer | b 297 . 68C 1181
A-28 | State of Iowa v. Pfizer ~ + | "3% “NY Iowa, s.« [lag 8-2130-C-2
A-29 {| State of Kansas v. Pfizer ~~ = oo | | Kansas “Pe I T-4404
-30 | State of Texas Vv. Lzer NI Texas, N.w Wy 3-2165
o (5ST Ynys TF N | !
A-31 | Continental Vitamin Corp. v. American << \NI/
Byanamid EE EAN New Jersey DA 1936-63
%¢ oy, 8 |	A .
™N

R ire
. i {
Lee . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C | : DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 10 _- MULTIDJSTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTAONS INVOLVING ANTIBZOTIC 'DRUGS
wi! | ANSHERRED 10 MMIN) C Soll) — 3% Use SMO¥A)	- J. LOPD1Date 1} District {
No. Caption Filed Court Judge 1D.C. No.
A-32§ City of San Francisco v. Pfizer Co arn Calif., N VA } 48909A-33 State of California v. Pfizer = ' " J)CWPE} " y 3 | 49044@::. Bidart Bros. v. Pfizer ' ~~ ~- aa 4 RE AZ. 2 49145
A-3Y Los Angeles County v. Pfizer " | 49670
i . } } 9 Fe. dee pare. > > 5)
A-3¢ American Medical Enterprises v. Pfize aliforni4q, ER 67-1365-R
A-37] Benalen v. Pfizer o LE pre” Yor 7) 23 67-793-RA-38 Domaro v. Pfizer : '.. .:.- _Zlprse neblS = "oo . 67-1366-R
. << CF 5 ‘22 -
NERS
. a
: ~~ \]
~
( |
N NN p
XYZ [#Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Pfizer & Cyanamjid , Ri Bad. S. 69 Civ32$g
" Blue Cross Ass'n, Inc., et al. v. A :
| ® pfizer, et al. 1 ] " 69 Civ. 820	" Blue Cross of Northeast Ohio, et al.
Pfizer, et al. PSI ov 7 " 69Civ.1015
" Blue Cross of Western Pa., et al. v.
: Pfizer, et al. Loses ays/ " 69Civ.2158
" | Connecticut Blue Cross, Inc. v._.- x A, /)
Pfizer, et al. tripe ee Leal vad . " ! 69Civ.1142	: " | District of Columbia v. Pfiger, et al ¥Zg£sargrig cs Ll A 69Civ.2778
" Georgia v. Pfizer, et al. & - =2% ; 2 69 Civ. 15	" Kentucky v. Pfizer, et al. > af f ep 68Civ.4453
" State. of Kuwait, et al. v. Pfizer,	et Jala Yc ite -~ s/8e/5 ( j69Civ.4091
nf UnichcHdatith Oentby GF New York et” 8X. + ANN
® “JY v. Pfizer, et al. | AF " a. bogiv. 2838Jroffa Medi SD/SMELE SE We SHH nid. "reg Ovalie, U-p civ 563EdgdrthBwipeidcky aa! & Plier” 1 TL| \ TIS " 69 Civ 51%=a ¢ :
Ny a \
A |

CL . 1
. ©. DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
@® DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
| DOCKET NO. 10 - MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING -
TIBIOTIC DRUGS Taper tled
| ef a. £ Amma) aneeh wy J §
= 7] District 3
No. Caption 4 Court Judge D.C. No.
’ [retreat d
B-1 [Ford Hopkins Tp., et LESS Y 44 — |
eo Pfizer | Brriede1. ZT ~ 4 111., N#J] | Robson 68 C 1698
®3-2 Icity and County of Denver v. Chas. ~ © [| /32/ P ]Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. = 84468 | " " 868 C 1478 -
2 Le . 2 id" ,
95-3 [State of New Jersey v. Chas. Pfizer = lu/s 7d 1
& Co., Inc., et al. =“ 7 iN $200 " : ANN 168 C 1564
™XYZ Richardson Durg, et al. v. Chas. P- co ANN |; CETTE A Mriss,
Pfizer & Co., et al. p LL GRY: 68-744-¢	(transferred 10/21/68 by Panel) ‘ :
| ®3¢c-1 Alpine Pharmacy, Inc., et al.	v. Chas. 1/7/47 ord \| . Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. "57 [1364+ ~y WL% Py 68 C 1952
| “Wpc-2 State of South Dakota v. Chas. Pfizer ¥,/a9/ oF J& Co., Inc., et al.	i? * 77 a8 S. Dak. EL ICiv.68-104¢
: ®C-3 [Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp. v.... {.. ,
| | Chas. Prizer & Co., Inc., et al. '3/¢g) Fla., sv 168 1131
R oC-4 |Lee's Prescription Shops, In¢., et al.]
| . v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Et al. 93/25 n LY l68-1204-CT
| @: Lee's Prescription Shops, Inc., et al.f / > y| v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. 6/2 " j68-1340-CI
| =r ssoktated-Hyspitei—Sek ice of New Yor}
| et gl. v. CRas. Pfizex & TOD ited) Nos
| et al.f~ FUND CTE SR PY BEY 971% N.Y., 5. i 468 Civ.376
| D>1)\ {Jackson Jospital dxd Clinic,\Inc., et \ ; :
Vp. al v. Chas. Pfizex & Co.,.Inc., et G
@ al NL, Ke LOBE alae 2809-N
D-2 jClark ‘Coufigs\ Hospiyal Association) Inc u |
et al.~¢. Chas. Pfizer\& Co., Inc\, - NO | y
et al. 12/30 “Ky.,	E\ “| 1906
> MM ransferred on 4/7/69 by Panel. :
RR |

/0
Co. . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
® | DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET 2 10 = i”) yz 2 ACTIONS INVOLVING ANTIBIOTIC DRUG	' my N ; > !
. - i ta i bog Sh CAA SF lla {ort 14 4 Fmt A
CERIN RPED	“1D MINNESOTA —S7/9048) AT. Lolth I,; 7 § District Y
No. Caption | Rly Court Judge D.C. No.
Y="D-1| Associated Hospital Service of New |
York, et al. v. Chas. Pfizer	& ; ES
® Co., Inc., et al. Nj N.Y., S.™. = §68 C 3763. : (CN :
op _» Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc., et > J
al. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. Inc., 3/7 A. >= TR
et al. =~ “oo fata. Mo TS 2809-N	: . a i
® p-3JClark County Hospital Asso., Inc., et LG :
a. v. Chas. Pfizer	& Co., Inc., 5/7 . /\et al. © Kf 2 [1946
® p-_LliDeKoven Drug Co., Inc., et al. v. Chaslo/« 7 |
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. Wo © 7» 724] Nb I 68 C 2478
®p_5 Massachippts > LAPSE 42,1 /% ) |: Cc . zer & (Q.,-1nc., teat. 2567 Mass." . /%) 68-1193-~C.
®D_G|The State of S05 Sa ee Se 7 457 Pz WiChas. Pfi 5, inc, VV E7)s. Bb R/x 168-1078
®p_7 Airzona Foundation for Pt lyPsychi s “Zt 87 744 4	Pfizer 0., Inc., et al. = "fF Arizona 7 6967-PHX
«* :
C D-8]The County o tcopa v. ChLIs oP ep bh el re y& Co., / mao AE m 1/ 6961-PHX
§D-9}State of Hawali v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.,| ski a BEInc., et al. = 7 7 CYA fHawall Yoo 2935
wp. 10|State of Utah v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., | NE oo |
Inc., et al. ~~ ~~ = 2/5/65 OM if., N° W 50536
®D_11 {State Sassi i FORAY 2s, ; ,oy 0 ah - a a 8
CES Hg al, = Se : i Vs /% jArk., BE.” hy, 168 C 254
@ Cristian Slospiisly EE YZ? 74 A) JE |	Co-é 7Z al. sl Mo., E. vip $68 C 5U46(2
®D-13 pethesta Spica) vO 4 ok |Co 4 cae al. : CT ¥ 24 Ohio, Ss. = JA £7) 68-406
8D-11 IBeins d/b/a Waverly Drugs LPB 7 oa Lo ’ y iPri So. pina et 74 . " | oF [69-73

10
| : . « N ,
IE . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C | DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
ROCKET NO. 10 — MULTIDISTRIQT CIVIL 08D -_§ /# S 2) =" AN 2/94 DRUGS	K TERNS. To MINA:	BY J. LoD	-~ a x </7f: ’ f Eo £.. Cad AD Ad oy LA , t PAW AW 7 3
# [Date.:/] District 7
No. Caption sam] | Court Judge D.C. No.E27 7
® 51 Commoner BEI Ca PPI 74 27 7 PBC Pfiz es C., et al. ~*~ 7/7 §Puerto Ricod Rag 869-68J . Te ’
ép-16] st. a 74) , | |: Cya 1 o., et al. — 27? 27 Minnesota vy 168 408
#D-17] Doughboy Industries, Inc., et al. v. 4/5 tyAmerican Cyanamid, Co., et al, TUN" \ 68 LoSid yt) CIC Ee
| @D-18} Minnesota Fur Foods Cooperative, et 45/e A	gl. y. American Cyanamid Co., et a}. yo Slater v2 §68 L410[riaieatisl Sd Cyanam ? Fr > 9
®D-19| The Grange Co., et al. v. American 4/2 y ' > Yq| Cyanamid Co., ef al. 7 7) ol Ta : 68 411' | |
XXX [Midwest Veterinary Supply, Inc., et Cg) . :
al v. American Cyanamid, et al. of nfetrye anesota p47 oo. Lp4-69 C 75(transferred by order of Judge Lord) ~~, , L Co age7/
(trapsferred by Papel P55 AE “/ ef 4 7/21	Errante 27/77 1 \
@: The State of Michigan, etc. v. Chas. 2/ A Co YoPfizer & Co., Inc., et al.’ : 2os/ I11., N..~ XU) 469 C179
®:-2 |The State of Idaho v. Chas. Pfizer & | !/ ; Jy N q
Co., Inc., et al. =~ Jeo Cc 121
®E-3 |The Metropolitan Government of i by
Nashville and Davidson County, etc. Hf a ’ |v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Ing., gf al I11., N. Rowors 9 C 210
. RE 2 1 Nu DN®*E-4 State of Wyoming v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. 7 i.
Inc., et al. EA " RN 69 C 215
@.. The City of Chicago, etc. v. Chas. If | SAPfizer & Co., Inc., et al. " vg Nes C 232
®r_1 [he sof of on Risa bk Chas : - || Prifédi aa6FALE ale aL BNA Rd 2) | 2287LSet TL : (Raleigh «Div}) >

. [©
oo- bo . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
[ J ___. DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION	4 : ye - a
DOCKET NO. 10 -- MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING
ANTIBIOTIC DRY § ye1} -—
Tos. To mine	AY TLD Fost)	~ Ff	: ¢s Fs eit ol 8 VBE, BVI a 47-4
~ I District 1
No. Caption "LL Rilo Court | Judge D.C. No.
No I	-MW Hawaii Medical Service Assoclation v. ( }
C Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. as 0 $22. EF 4 68-2799CT a To i 4 Te, ’
i 1
«1 |The Sg Laney iy Se Bs bv, KE |	Pfizer O., Inc., i 2A : Je] Montana ¥ 2) 1733
®1-1 Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. v. Generic b/s ~'4\ Ps CoFormulae, Inc., et al. = °° ANY, E. 4 J 66 C 640	Le § —
LC) . . A
J-1 ]Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. v. Richlyn Yaz | YDLaboratories, Inc. ER JAF Ripa. E../ > §L2648N |
Prfee OC. SY . n/a) Iowa, SJ £1 8-2328-C~-1
®1-1 |State pps EP er & / iH 2 7¢	Co., 5% al. 4/L Tenn., E.” Taylor 6559
M-1 {State of Washington, etc, v. Chas, tL PN A Ze |
Pfizer & Co., et al. Vigo tr Lo fi <1} Wash., W¢ | Lindberg 8184
To? 174 .. oF ) ! |
ml EE at | |	E P 0., et aXe Too 7 Ye] | Maryland NIA | 20578
{aN reagfex Security Fund of Novrthéen® Ir NyId coh Ine. wi LOHR Pfizer. EE 4/2 i Fr v id	& Co. Inpc., et al, - C=3faL “led Cal?®f., Nv | 51010
®p_1 | Marvin Barkal, Etc., v. Chas. Pfizer & $11{RY X oY| Co., Inc., et al. - c-97 So RSLS, NS Lynch 69 C 647
vp-2 MarioBlogente FZ BA Pr zr a ey | |	x CEFF ., et w= “/1% Hosta car. | Cc.” S 69-260-CC
Ch . 7, “al. Mi a -69 Civ.
| @. 0., Ings, tly, 419eq inn 3 0 iA -4 Hel eS Si cP 2 “oo. oo r/ .Pri Sane., ey ayy To Jf pet Puerto Rico#| CIV. 130-69
@¥P-5 JSun Ray Drug Company, etc. v. Chas So by (yyPf -& Co., Inc., et al. _ Fa. E. at 469-687
2 pro |

|O
SE DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
® DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
" DOCKET NO. 10 - MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ‘ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING
ww ANTIDIDTIC CRUGS gp, Be oca’ Jeon gbZ
TRANS.	TO MINER BY	«J IPR DRis@ o/c) - 8/LV Y	pe. TO te BY ND SHON Cos A ve.
P-6 § The Serge Nebratksasroiay a re : ay /0/89
C & Co.5 Ine.” et a Coe Y/R 5/6/69 Nebraska Js ’ Civ. 1513TT Tones Re 51, ,., Vransas. [femplar | 7-us560Chas Pf1Z 0., Inc. > E78 TENS: :
pP-8 roup Health Cooperative of Puget > ~} | | 3
Sound v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., ere Td ; oF 7 :Inc., et al. SLOP SED 4 YBN. w. Yo ]s8222
P-9 | Jack Englandav. Chas. Pfizer & Co., 3]. ALN EN LY .
Inc., et al. 5 J Sv yi : LA 2/1/27 A ke, W. - 2 Po FED-69-C-8
P-10f State Aaa ps2 7( | E S723, |	<¥ Co., Inc., et al. 7/7 IC Te Zr lsd | Alaska” von r HeydkJ-2-69
P-1) Sity ofdansie	Clb seo iioz ly oP Ee -	Pfider & Co., #% er. T= 7. cf	Mo lw. R-? } 17465BY & = Rs F C0 my } £ | \ - |
p-1 sui 1ding. orFwices Brion Wealth’§ welfafe yA
| Trust Fund V. Chas. Pfizer g«Co.; ~ 79/69 aXTE., NoVA 451523Inc., et al... °° | A Al 4
@:: Bernard and Mark Lachman, et al., v. y ) wo h 4 ? 20971 CivChas. Pfizer ,§ Co., Inc. ’ 1, ¢ [4 y b	7 - ) il ;
P-14 | Edward Brothers Milling Co., Inv. v. k/ g | Np eal ina y ) J 2372 Civ.
| Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc,, et al [EP Psst.
P-15f Lester Cronley, eke Chasi” Edger | of AY x _IN Ar R& Co., Inc., et (at oo £ FZ Ya 3 ©" JHolder §IP-69-C-366hi 5 Fig
P-16} Ralph Pfau d/b/a Victor Bar acy; et X. ; Flal. v. Chas. Pfizer & oC Pree Fim a. , s/4 “folder [IP-69-C-36
@.. Burgess Poultry Market, Inc., et al |. TYAS, w. 9, of 14 |Civasocalv. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al Veale IN | 7-40 08
pP-18 Missouri Farmers Asso., Inc., et al. {| h hy 9
v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. Wife RL, W. : | 17640-4

- ‘ /0
: i . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION :
> 3 . N 7 . N ' ' oo
—_————— eee ees
9 DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
DOCKET NO. 10 - MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING
4 ANTI TTC DRUGS
FTPs. TEM: 3 _ Spam) - C14)
wi Date | District |
No. Caption Ey Court Judge D.C. No.
p£€%er & Co., Inc., et 25% / 3%7 | N. Ill. Austin 69C 1859	(li, wv f
@Q.. Sol 2 Turnoff Brug Rist Incl ,/ of || et GI. v. Amérrcan Cy Rand) Za iad E. l 69-1885
p-21 Immanuel, Ing¢.v. Chas. Pfizer &Co., IB) 4/7 Y 7 Sa § 03373Inc. et RS Cl ATA) on
P-22 Haver Lord Zoshipat Lops Vv. 1/¢ 74 Pa., E. | 69-2249	Ch&E Zer & Co., | SHEP Vr] 211
P-23 The Anderson Cattle Co., et al vy. st (Of Ye PE Gnll¢s- §¢32 T-4659Amer. Cyan. Co., et al, es (4 ."es
pP-24 Washington State Hospital Ass., et al fale] ‘Wash., W. } } 8539 £
| P-25) Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. v. Chas. SPN Yo	Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. JJ 4/ fs if, raw
4 ’ res; Jl alir,, N. L999 Y | 52342
| P-26 A. C. Smith Poulrty Co., etc. v. “J A3y N./2 y 4 1293	; > = 4 ime ni fb
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. et al / [9 CZ , 4 EY A GY || P-27] Rutledge Ranch etc. v. Charles Pfizer dosha., N. / N\CA-69-766
| o & Co., Inc., et al 13/73 I 3%) SES| P-28 Guy J. Phelps, Jr. v. Chas. Pfizer [7 >" ys _ || & Co., Inc., et al. /4/ i ~"¥K4., N. p) 67 8 3a’ A 69-767
P-29 | Kenneth Murray Co. v. Chas. Pfizer 3/03 LS /2 | |; & Co., Inc., et al. Mx | 77 ALA., nv." Pel	F TEP{ra 69-768
P-30 International Rectifier Corp., et al. A ill
v. American Cyanamid Co., et al.”z) IY 7 Calif. , C. &regerson 69-2484-HP’ # YALE Pe a - ]
P-31 IDr. E. J. Hoffert, et al, v. American, 2
9 Cyanamid Co., et al. le 7.477; rh innesota Vz Pepe 3¢e7 4-69 Civ458i Bh 3 / - P2wy 9-7 |
P-32 Sylvan Acres Ingyq. el. 2d £ 1S 02 A 17 4 2 J . - |Pfizer & Col TA Rel B < NLD } ., N. “% IrbBson Tej}70 C 39
P-33 Marshall Durbin roca. Chas. Pfizer ZA 0 Ala., M. Zl 3015-N& Co., Inc. et al 2/5/10 AT 11 Ye a yi

\ -¥ » ‘ DOCKET NO. 10
© DOCKET =-- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
. . 4 . K bd :
—_—_—_—————————	ee ——————
9 ; Description of vegation , =
MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST, ACTIPNS INVRLVING ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS
Vv seemmmme- 8. § CWER SEMA Pe a a a ye ggg —
b J / J 4 "7 - I . y v SED i AE d/ — YNO. AD N D NUMBER . A MIS 74
P~34{ The National Farmers' Organization Inc.,|Ohio, S. 17 Xecif70et of ND Amer icgh 5 Jd Co., et al}7398 pu. 20 Cnr [AIR	Fed inaem L Ee
oS, PSEA SVD ashe, Le nn
P-35 |} The Rep. of Viet-Nam v. Chas. Pfizer “NE N. 7 34/0 BA a& Co., Inc., et al 2/20/70 9 99 / Je Cte 2
~Pp-36 |Richard X Conngxrp£et al v. Chas. Pfizer Vir., E. 3/13) vn PY 43& Co., Inc et SZ 77 AS ZI 0-70-2
| | Ne Ym© P=-37 ssociated Life Insurance Co. etc. Vepg 1., N. Fe Coot HK Hf
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al 3/2/79 0 C 368 4 }» i ‘ 2C
p-38 | carl F. Dodge etc. v. Chas Ji 7 ‘Werte Ne will 4/30 =? ven	pfizer & Co., Inc., et al KANO C 500 29 Zep	1 SCC
B-39 Thrifty Drug Co. Inc., et al v. Pfizer: }/} alif., C AAH j lO “ioy |
& Co., Inc. et al M/3 fo weghff} 70-502AAH	7
Sapa | Heresfang—y—Commonweattirtriteed Hep r——Grr—
. TCEem=—o3 8 Dedatanfll.
p-4o Malcolm-Gregg Co., Inc., et al v. Chass .{Calif., N.- 3/708 Yo Cap
Pfizer and Co., Inc.,.et al 78/90 Jol c-70-613 WTS ol i/ 24 VCP-41 Bernard Kay, et al v. Chas. Pfizer & Co. - > o, S. } di 90 (iv. 140
Inc., et al SHPO LATED TEMLFFERN-76 / A> va / 7)
P-42 he rrengglosbital ode Yo .D. Calif. % g Pry 4( Chas. izer & Co., In ls 7 od 470-1101-1IH IH G4 0) GIF Ayy rE ~ &
P-43 allay ClerksPRS / is, CERMITIY . Calif. D/ as 0)	~& Co., Inc., et al A : -70-1294LHHB LHB Va ft - .of ) 2 Fy, vi A
P-44 | San Explheisco Cplinagy, Bartenders and--fFRRY. Calif. ain | "lent	$ servitesmmpiosaes Welfaat Fond v. Ch#AN-YY-1295 acw 7 = LLL,
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al a Nff A 2
4 / 74 B
EY . # / p ¢ . : 4
P-45 |Retail” Clerks Lgcal 770 & a Ep 47 Sa sal lf A g/ Zi CL4 iow 0g 0d a¥vA	i Gibrs Pd er © PINO-3681 | acw iz 7 so oo
Co. $e , et al SH a	E J 1 i " " £ ar o ) | a A . / .
| Q... Bakeyp Hae LithA Welfare ‘Bhd, eral, ar Ww. Calif. fo sho FRYER. | i ollie ene 4 & Co., Inc., et al A C+-70-1680 ACW 5/4 /
| P-4 og EET E Moo nw Lara FT . i N oh \ os id v r 7
ouisianh Hatcheries, Tnc., ‘et al v. SJ Eo» La. Rppefos |: pe MFO- 3000 ECR WEE
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc,, et al As
| Vs are
| lta Ti py

~ ” IN
INE ‘ ‘ | DOCKET NO. 10
\ FI . - . a v J —
a. * ‘DOCKET =-- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIONEl , . i * >
- : Description of Litigation .
o X TEpuS TO MINN. BY oF. LAD Y/%e6) = 10ULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST INVOLVING i Aa RUGS	- i tg ” a 2 “ * t & sag i yd I. 4
LE DISTRICT &
ON, CAPTION D.C. NUMBER] JUDGE DATE MISC,
XYZ-2 alifornia Physicians' Service v. Chas. N.¥. S. s
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al 69 Civ 4746 Ne
o és2 PAY Sextet- Cota 0 x y IAbefofafapm - a
: . JC A ev hn a NEES a ae .	53 . EA ¢ ZL LY i
i 4c ye A 4 Gi a ~~
0-1 |Mutual of omp#f Ing. £oy, st als vo 1] iggeess < [Edesondg 4 7 YESHAmerican SH IAS, i)a LEivit-4Peers 4 i> 71
0-2 American Cyanamid Co. wv, Rachelle Lab. .D. CALIF. J Ls»Inc. (Motion. 3/10/71) " |70-521-gwc Cell 14d
0-3 |American Cyanamnyi “Coy. Rachelle Lab., C.D. CALIF ¢lre)2, 27 Cv 653Inc. (Moti 3/30/71) 71-242-JWC : ARRAN REC 7
SE Wg	ry Se RE EC ATJ
US epses TRANSFECRED TO MINNESTTY UNDER. i
§/yodbk) by oF. coed (8[sfw)
| ) sz J i A ’ ie ) L]
Y a ; . J i / ’ if ’ yd : i = SF
( / 5 oo Ea | oo
. SO - . Ea - he N

. ’ ) DOCKET NO. 10
An . —_—
) DOCKET ~-- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
ee
@® Description of Litigation .
ANTIBIOTIC ANTITRUST LITIGATION |
| SY |DISTRICT & TRANSFER :
NO. | BAa77INA FADS ESCRED 7 D.C. NUMBER] JUDGE} DATE MISC.
“2 UNNESOTA |
R-1 L.. I. Edelson, et ail. v. Chas. Pfizer W.D. Penna. 4 0/7: SCO 11/1& Co., et al. 71 589 Rosenbdrd” ojo fe
-2 The Republic of the Philippines v. D.C. Sa2/7. CO 4/14	Pfizer, Inc., et al. 650-72 bys	a
PLize Bev. International Rectifier .D.Calif. [Real } 7/4 y2 s Sr	Corp get ady n Zoos Aers-sgrT [ES iy Maw 73] 1% yoy
3 | Prd mn a 2% edpdey . ky § EP ER ne JBelen n Bp ror tg Vpn DANTTB EY foal) YT We
™ SY Imperial Governmetn of Iran v. Pfizer D. Minn. Order-Inc., et al. 4-74-65 J. Lord and	J. Larson
of 2/6/74 :
CL 4 Vy 77-C0A
S-2 Pfizer Inc. v. International Rectifier C.D.Cal YY dy Mifa fen 3/14, 25Corp., et al. | 74-353-rIK 12
“= po30 Inter'l Rectifier Corp., et al. v. ) On 7/12/74-
American Cyanamid Co., et al. (C.D.Calf ~ > 4 ‘ hod AL a 1404 (a)
No. 69-2484-HP; S.D.N.Y. No. 70 Civ.180} 4. 74. £47 qd. 5/. 25 transfer to
| (] Minnesota b	-40 Malcolm Gregg«.Co., Inc., et al. WV Shers | - Lo Administra-
peter Cog Lack - ND Ea Ne- Yo. 3741 AF | tive OrderC-70-613-Wr&: S.D.N.Y. No. 70Civ.1605) | = 19 74-55	I
inhi A EE mss
S-3 Pfizer, Inc ., Revlon, Inc, : Vie 7) he Lai) adi ea	AY ¥ §1409a Zz C oo CA? ¥//6 Sega
NY LTL
xvz-2N The government of India Vv. Pfizer, Inc., | D. Minn. Order .
® et al, 4-74 Civ. 496 10/15/17) PUY A Lv, . Misc Order
s-aV Leg ef 7 vf Cts JP, ry (rip » 74-20oH RTE FEA cf4-2492-RF fl SEN\, llied Chemical” #79 -	~ XYZ-3 Republic of Germany (West) v. Pfizer & C$. D. Minn. 3
4-T74-614
) - 10H 4 J?
| St avd P-30 - sw apacal FLY	7 108 (54

Case MDL Npotke@osomen/DFiediratiap Page 30 of 34 PAGE He
— Te TT TTT TT yo 1 me . —
Intra- District Civil Date of
Office ' and Actiog Transfer] Transferee| Dismissal - )
Number| ~~ Caption ~~ | Judge| Nupler |Date|Docket No.jor Remand] Misc. |
S-5 T YY =)Jog 5. cifraipre yhoe, SDC. 74 746</ {La © dh atbd Noli » Bryant
rd yA J. , r’
S-6 The Government of Colombia v. -U.D.C. 74-1747 bye JT 7Pfizer Inc., et al. 27. 7* Bryant
s-7 T e c oyea fy. i DD : +8 1s J =H vhf,rar JST Bryant .
NN ’ 7 N
5-8 A Ma@e Gag dp 3 og Mod ig & N.D. Ill} 73C346l = 4 “25, %. /- '	HL rma +5 fries CYTICT 1/77 #12 ZLPfixer & Co. Ipc., et al. _
5 2/30/75
|
HPO. Calli 7 F
XYz~4 | American Medical Centers, Inc. v. D. Minn. |4-75-562 CT -/ (7/77	Pfizer, BEX Inc.
XYZ-5 United States of America v. D. Minn | 4-74-36 :
American Cyanamid Co.
|
| | | | | -| | | | | || | ! |
| | | |
| | | | ! | |{ i i
| | | |! | | :
| | i	i i {

Ly oo . DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION :
. . . R ) B . ~ M
C ’ DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
Ny - Pos - 22005 2 ACTIONS INVOLVING +: a DRUGSPai Ak Boia, © ve 7 , / Ariel
KX q: wh a g - ‘A T7¢	RENOIERKED 10 JWNIVESY	FH — §/YOYNR) ~~. LOAD	- Yjfe/7/
Date | District {
No. Caption Filed Court Judge D.C. No.
@ State of Colorado v. Chas. Pfizer &Co., Inc., et al. \/ N.Y., S. J 68 C 5141
“X-2fstate of Missouri v. Chas. Pfizer &
Co., Inc., et al. " Q 168 C 5180
"X-3 State of Oklahoma v. Chas. Pfizer & /\ NCo., Inc., et al. " 68 C 5096
‘x-U|State of Rhode Island v. Chas. Pfizer INQ |
& Co., Inc., et al. " : NN 68 C 5112
“X-5} Commonwealth of Virginia v. Chas. \/ BN
Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. /\/ " \} 168 C 1540	'X-6]Beekman-Downtown Hospital, et al. v..	|
Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al. ™ /N " 69 C 135	: ¢
| "X-7]The State of New Hampshire, etc. v. [|
| Chas. Pfizer & Co., Ine¢., et al. n 468 C 4878
| 4 Trentiebh-Centt Fox ilm Corp. , ©t—
j al v—Geinnel]l Corp., ef al. - te=c=me2s
@‘X-8 { Maine v. Pfizer yp TPO Xo XoN.Y., S. 69Civ.916
X-9 | Vermont v. Pfizer /Z py =~. = “= = =) H9Civ.915
. : . fn
“X-10 § American Hospital Assoc. v. Pfizer—2rl 69Civ.755
“X-11 | Hospital Service Corp. of Rhode IslandZZZzzt a :
v. Pfizer == S74 $8Civ.4971
XYZ United States of America v. Chas. |; /3 q 2 Pd a “ic Pfizer & Co., Inc. ef al. PTT vy D."C. | dee tif 11966-69	tao Fig fe Fe. Hat PA 1 or wv ’ = ' "	Sadi ; E 4 ) Cai ) , (4 3 .
EP p= : deel) VO i : :
Wee poy i 3C , : “il
X - tag-along cases in transferee
district - no transfer necessary

oo 1S0N_LIST SE —	- MA! SERVICE LISTJUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
C DOCKET NO. 10 =-- IN RE ANTIBIOTIC DRUG ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff Defendant
Chairman, Farm Plaintiffs
Chairman, National Steering Committee
(Plaintiffs) . DEFENDANTS LIAISON COUNSEL
- (Defendant American Cyanamid Company
ohm A. Cochrane, Esquire Samuel W. Murphy, Jr., Esquire
® -_Cog Bresnakdn “Donovan, fioisuze, Newton & Irvine	fe 830 ssota Bldg. 30 Rrockeffeller Plaza
AD St , Minnesota 55101 New York, New York KXXX 10020 3	(Also See Below)
Liaison Counsel for City, County and Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.
State Plaintiffs RQ _Z, Belchep Esduire 4.	—
= 8 Robert E. Wur , Esquire Gif Cin fie Te er
=z Deputy Atto Y enoral 63 CJT oN Sd A i /
= rtment/of tice #2 Angeles, Calif®rnia 90014	State Buifding :
Seg. Lrancisco, calik. 94102 Robert E. Cooper, Esq. ;	a 2Q . Chas. Ptizer & Co., Inc.
Liaison Counsel for Miscellaneous | 235 East 42nd Street :	aintiffs a New York, New York 10017
PAVE Sus Granvil I. {pecks, Esquire {Also See Below) ;
4g Friedman, Ko , Salzman, Bristol-Myers Co. )= Koenigsberg \ Specks & Homer Merrill E. clark, Jr., Esquire
emg. alle treet Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberss:“pbsage, Illinois. 60604 40 Wall Street	New York, New York 10005
Depository of\Plaintiffs' National
Steering, Commiftte, 0lin Corporation
= Flo E oline, Esquire Sguibb-Beech-Nut, Inc.	Ch&stnuty Jones, Brooks, E. R. Squibb& Sons, Inc.
® nne & Burkard Allen F. Maulsby, Esquire j	Shiite, #54) Midland Bank Bldg. Cravath, Swaine & Moore
inndapolis, Minnesota 55401 One Chase Manhattan Plaza
New York, New York 10005
| United States| Paul A. Owens, Esquire Upjohn Co. )
Antitrust Division, Rm. 6245 Charles	E. Buffon, Esquire
Department of Justice Covington & Burling
Washington, D. C. 701 Union Trust Building wf| Washington, D. C. 20005
> OVER

. Pe. oo - * -
Plaintiff Defendant
R-1 Ly tman itman, Harris & Specter wr,
cp fied , Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. :PitTsbl¥gh, Pennsylvania 15219 Peter R. Cohen, Esquire CRosenfeld, Meyer & Susman
9601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite4$44
Beverly. Hills) California 46240
American Cyanamid Co.
Samuel W. Murphy, Jr., Esquire (Above)
W. Brown Morton, Jr., Esquire
LITAISON COUNSEL FOR HEALT & INSURANCES Morton, Bernard, Brown, Roberts & Sutherland
~~ COMPANIES 1054 31st Street, N.W.
VETERINARY WHOLESALER Washington, D. C. 20007
Richard W. Johnson, Esquire CJohnson, Thompson, Spring & Klaverkamp
4444 IDS Center
B80 South Eighth Street = ; Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.
~ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 George P. Williams, III, EsquireSchnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis
Liaison Counsel for Farm Group Biaintiffs 1719 Packard Building
DQuglas V. Rigler, Jsquire Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
HoXNlabaugh & Jagobgy
sy yall) hard) Bf ding CHAS. PFIZER IN FOREIGN CASES
114 1X NP NY John H. Morrison, EsquireWhsiingfoh, D~L. 20006 Kirkland & Ellis ‘
200 East Randolph Drive
Room 5900 ’
J-/ Chicago, Illinois 60601Plaintiffs counsel in 73-58-R
Gibson, Dunn & Cruther i
| Attorney La TT ee
515 S. Elowd Street REVLON CO
| Los Angeles) Calif. 90017 Ellen B. Friedman, Esquire
. Kadison, Pfaelzer, Woodard, Quinn
Lawrence J. Hayes, Esquire '& Rossi
Maumy Hazed, Green, Hayes ; 611 West Sixth Street ®	Simon,	apd Aretz : Twenty-Third Floor
332 Ham dg. Los Angeles, California 90017
St. Padl, inn. 55102
- CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE
W. D. Flaskamp, ESg.
Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson
Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan
2250 IDS Center
: Minneapolis, Minn. 55402
MALCOLM GREGG CO., INC.
S-4 Roger R. Mulholland, Esquire Robert D.Raven, Esquire CGeram & Mulholland Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton
1703 Fifth Avenue & Clark
San Rafael, California 94901 Crocker Plaza
San Francisco, California 94104

Li - w . )
. ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
—— ee —_— ee
C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION :
DOCKET NO. 10 -- IN RE MULTIDISTRICT CIVIL ANTITRUST ACTIONS INVOLVING
ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS
OU
No. Plaintiff Defendant
5-5 L . nN uire
S-6| Kirkwood, an, Russih & Vecchi |
5-7| 1218 Simt€enth Street, N.W., an 'W ington, D. C. 20036 (A
S-8 Louis M. March, Esq.
188 W. Randolph Street
oT Chicage, Illinois 60601
| ] .