IN RE: Community Health Systems, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.,
CUSTOMER SECURITY DATA BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 2595
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in an action pending in the Northern District of Alabama move*
under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in that district. The litigation consists of the five
actions listed on Schedule A. All responding parties support centralization in the Northern District1
of Alabama – although responding defendants suggest, in the alternative, that we select the Middle
District of Tennessee as transferee district.2
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that centralization under
Section 1407 in the Northern District of Alabama will serve the convenience of the parties and
witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions – all of which
are putative nationwide class actions – share factual questions arising from the electronic theft of
personally identifiable information and personal health information of approximately 4.5 million
customers or patients of common defendants Community Health Systems, Inc., and Community
Health Systems Professional Services Corporation. Centralization will eliminate duplicative
discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings on class certification and other issues, and conserve
the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.
After weighing all relevant factors, we select the Northern District of Alabama as transferee
district for this litigation. As mentioned, both moving plaintiffs and all responding parties support
selection of the district, and we conclude that it is an appropriate choice. The Honorable Karon O.
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan took no part in the decision of this matter. Certain Panel members*
who could be members of the putative classes in this litigation have renounced their participation
in those classes and have participated in this decision.
The Panel has been informed of four additional related federal actions. Those actions and1
any other related federal actions are potential tag-along actions. See Panel Rules 1.1(h), 7.1, and 7.2.
Responding plaintiffs are those in the District of New Mexico, Middle District of2
Pennsylvania, and Southern District of West Virginia actions. Responding defendants are
Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, Community Health Systems, Inc.,
and the self-described “Alabama Defendants”: Riverview Medical Center; Gadsden Regional
Medical Center, LLC; Foley Hospital Corporation; Affinity Hospital, LLC; Anniston HMA, LLC;
and Gadsden Regional Physician Group Practice, LLC.
Case MDL No. 2595 Document 49 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 3

-2-
Bowdre, to whom we assign this litigation, is an experienced jurist, and we are confident that she
will steer the proceedings on a prudent course.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside
the Northern District of Alabama are transferred to the Northern District of Alabama, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Karon O. Bowdre for coordinated or consolidated
pretrial proceedings.
PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Sarah S. Vance
Chair
Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer
Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor
Catherine D. Perry
Case MDL No. 2595 Document 49 Filed 02/04/15 Page 2 of 3

IN RE: COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.,
CUSTOMER SECURITY DATA BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 2595
SCHEDULE A
Northern District of Alabama
ALVERSON, ET AL. v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,
C.A. No. 2:14-01620
Southern District of Mississippi
LAWSON, ET AL. v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,
C.A. No. 3:14-00712
District of New Mexico
BRITO v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14-00929
Middle District of Pennsylvania
ROMAN v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,
C.A. No. 3:14-01705
Southern District of West Virginia
GLAH, ET AL. v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A.
No. 2:14-25783
Case MDL No. 2595 Document 49 Filed 02/04/15 Page 3 of 3