USA v. ADEOGUN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Cause No. 	1:22-cr-00040-JRS-TAB
)
TOKUMBUH ADEOGUN, 	) 	- 01
)
Defendant. 	)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 13, 2026, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for
Offender Under Supervision filed on December 17, 2025. Defendant Adeogun appeared in person
with his appointed counsel from the Federal Community Defenders, Bill Dazey. The Government
appeared by Assistant United States Attorney Adam Eakman. U.S. Probation appeared by Officer
Martin Burtt.
The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P.
32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:
1. 	The Court advised Defendant Adeogun of his rights and provided him with a copy
of the petition. Defendant Adeogun orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.
2. 	After being placed under oath, Defendant Adeogun admitted to violation number 1
in the petition dated December 17, 2025. 	The Government orally moved to withdraw the
remaining violations (#2 - #4 in petition dated December 17, 2025, and #5 - #6 in previous petition
dated September 2, 2025), which motion was granted by the Court.
Case 1:22-cr-00040-JRS-TAB Document 56 Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
3. 	The allegations to which Defendant Adeogun admitted, as fully set forth in the
petition, are:
Violation
Number 	Nature of Noncompliance
1 	“You must refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance.
You must submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from
imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as
determined by the court"
As previously reported to the Court, Mr. Adeogun tested positive for
cannabinoids on January 18, 2022, October 14, 2022, March 10, 2023,
January 25, 2024, March 29, 2024, As noted in previous violation petitions,
Mr Haskins tested positive for PCP on February 27, 2024, as well as
November 14, September 25, August 21, August 15, August 2, July 20, July
5, and January 5, 2023. On September 25, February 6, and January 5, 2023,
October 15, 2024, November 27, 2024, February 14, 2025, April 2, 2025,
and August 28, 2025. Mr. Adeogun admitted to using marijuana on each
occasion, with the exception of the October 15, 2024, screen, in which he
reported he believed the positive result was from his use of Delta 8
gummies, and the August 28, 2025 screen, in which Mr. Adeogun admitted
to smoking Delta 9 on August 27, 2025.
Additionally, on December 4, 2025, Mr. Adeogun tested positive for
cannabinoids. He denied any use of cannabinoids and the sample was sent
for confirmation. On December 11, 2025, the probation office received
confirmation that Mr. Adeogun's sample was positive for the marijuana
metabolite. On December 15, 2025, Mr. Adeogun again denied any use of
cannabinoids.
4. 	The Parties stipulated that:
(a) 	The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation.
(b) 	Defendant’s criminal history category is I.
(c) 	The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised
release, therefore, is 3 to 9 months of imprisonment.
5. 	The Parties jointly recommended a sentence of 5 months imprisonment with no
supervised release to follow. 	The Parties jointly recommended that Defendant be granted the
ability to self-surrender to the Bureau of Prisons pending a designation order.
Case 1:22-cr-00040-JRS-TAB Document 56 Filed 01/13/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

3
6. 	The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to the
extent deemed appropriate by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds
that the Defendant violated the conditions as admitted in the petition, that his supervised release
should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or her
designee for a period of 5 months with no supervised release to follow.
7. 	The Court granted the Parties' request for Defendant to be allowed to self-surrender,
pending the designation order from the Bureau of Prisons. Defendant was informed that while his
designation order is prepared, Defendant remains under all current conditions of release.
Defendant stated he understood. 	Any violation of those conditions or any new violations
shall promptly be brought directly to the attention of the undersigned Magistrate Judge and
will result in prompt action by the Court.
8. 	The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter
referred to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period to object to the
Report and Recommendation.
Distribution:
All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the Court’s ECF system
Date: 1/13/2026
Case 1:22-cr-00040-JRS-TAB Document 56 Filed 01/13/26 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>