USA v. Mayhew

1:25-cr-00156Gand8 oct. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. 	CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
ANTON MAYHEW, a/k/a
ANTON PEYTON, a/k/a
JAMIE RAYFORD,
1:25-CR-00156-SEG-LRS-1
Defendant.
O R D E R
This case is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 68.) No objections have been filed in response
to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and
Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court has reviewed
the Magistrate Judge’s R&R for clear error and finds none. The Court hereby
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R as the order of this Court. Mr.
Mayhew’s motions, whether styled as motions or included in his notices, are
DENIED. (Docs. 38, 43-50, 55, 67.)
Case 1:25-cr-00156-SEG-LRS Document 85 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2
Because Mr. Mayhew has previously claimed not to have received service
of court documents through jail mail, Mr. Mayhew’s stand-by counsel is
respectfully DIRECTED to promptly provide Mr. Mayhew with this order as
well as the Court’s order of September 25, 2026. (Doc. 79.)
SO ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2026.
SARAH E. GERAGHTY
United States District Judge
Case 1:25-cr-00156-SEG-LRS Document 85 Filed 10/08/26 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.