HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Officer MITCHELL, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
5:24-cv-00154-TES-CHW
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation [Doc. 32]. Plaintiff Bradley Mandela Houston did not object to the
Recommendation in the allotted time. [Id. at p. 8]. So, after reviewing it for clear error, the
Court ADOPTS it and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
6(a)(1) and (d); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended that Defendants’
motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted and that Plaintiff’s claim be dismissed.
[Doc. 32, p. 8]. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 26] is
GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claim is DISMISSED. [Doc. 1].
SO ORDERED, this 18th day of November, 2025.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:24-cv-00154-TES-CHW Document 33 Filed 11/18/25 Page 1 of 1