Apple Corps Limited v et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 25-cv-25009- BLOOM/Elfenbein
APPLE CORPS LIMITED and SUBAFILMS
LIMITED,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES AND
UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,”
Defendants.
/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of a Preliminary
Injunction (the “Motion”), ECF No. [27], filed on November 26, 202. The Court has carefully
considered the Motion, the record in this case, the applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised.
Plaintiffs, Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”), move
for entry of a preliminary injunction against Defendants1 for alleged violations of the Lanham Act,
15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125(a). The Court held a hearing on December 5, 2025, which was
attended by counsel for Plaintiffs. During the hearing, Plaintiffs directed the Court to evidence
supporting the Motion. None of the Defendants formally responded to the Motion, nor have they
made any appearance or filing in this case, either individually or through counsel. Because
Plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements for the issuance of a preliminary injunction, the Court
1 Defendants are the Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule
“A.”
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 1 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
2
grants the Motion.
I. 	BACKGROUND2
Plaintiff, Apple Corps Limited, is the owner of the following trademarks (the “BEATLES
Marks”), which are valid and registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO):
Trademark Registration
Number Registration Date 	Class(es) / Good(s)
THE BEATLES 	1,752,120 	February 16, 1993 	IC 025 - Headwear, sweatshirts, t-shirts, shirts.
BEATLES 	4,373,956 	July 30, 2013
IC 021 – Beverage glassware; statuettes and figurines
of ceramic; plates; drinking vessels, namely, glasses,
mugs, jugs, and tankards not of precious metal;
bottles, namely, sport bottles sold empty, and
vacuum bottles; insulated bottles, namely, thermal
insulated bottles and flasks for beverages; cookie
jars; coasters other than of paper or of table linen;
serving trays not of precious metal; drinking glasses;
bottle openers; lunch boxes; shaped cookie cutters;
small domestic containers, namely, piggy banks not
of metal, salt and pepper shakers, salt and pepper pots
not of precious metal; tea cups and saucers; coasters
not of paper and other than table linen, namely,
coasters made of ceramic tiles for beverages.
IC 024 - Household linen; bed linen; bed sheets,
pillowcases, towels.
IC 025 - Footwear and headgear, namely, hats and
caps; clothing, namely, shirts, polo shirts, t-shirts,
sweatshirts; jackets, coats; scarves; neck-ties; socks;
long-sleeved shirts and long-sleeved t-shirts; fleece
tops; thermal tops; jerseys; tank tops; swim wear;
slippers; cloth babies' bibs.
2 The factual background is taken from Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF No. [29], Plaintiffs’
Application for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. [9], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary
Injunction (“Motion”), ECF No. [27], and supporting evidentiary submissions. Plaintiffs filed declarations
and exhibits annexed thereto in support of their Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion:
Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1], Wiborg-Rodriguez Decl., ECF No. [9-3], Burns Decl., ECF No. [9-4].
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 2 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
3
See Declaration of Paul Cole (Cole Decl.), ECF No. [9-1] at ¶¶ 4–5; ECF No. [29-1] (containing
Certificates of Registration for the BEATLES Marks at issue). The BEATLES Marks are used in
connection with the manufacture, promotion, distribution, and sale of high-quality goods in the
categories identified above. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1] at ¶¶ 4–5.
Plaintiff, Subafilms Limited, is the owner of the following trademark (the “YELLOW
SUBMARINE Mark”), which is valid and registered on the USPTO:
Trademark Registration
Number
Registration
Date Class(es) / Good(s)
3,328,170 November 6,
2007
IC 024 - Household linen; bed
linen; bedspreads; bed sheets,
pillowcases, towels.
IC 025 - Shirts; polo shirts; t-
shirts; long-sleeved shirts and
long-sleeved t-shirts; sweatshirts;
jackets; pullovers; vests; scarves;
neck-ties; hats; caps; sock;
thermal tops; jerseys; sweaters;
tank tops; pajamas; clothing for
toddlers, infants and babies
namely, one piece garments for
infants and toddlers, sleep suits, t-
shirts and long-sleeved t-shirts.
See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1] at ¶¶ 10-11; ECF No. [29-2] (containing Certificate of Registration
for the YELLOW SUBMARINE Mark at issue). The YELLOW SUBMARINE Mark is used in
connection with the manufacture, promotion, distribution, and sale of high-quality goods in the
categories identified above. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1] at ¶¶ 10-11.
Defendants, by operating the Internet based e-commerce stores under the seller names (the
“E-commerce Store Names”) listed on Schedule “A” hereto have advertised, promoted, offered for
sale, or sold goods bearing and/or using what Plaintiffs have determined to be counterfeits,
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 3 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
4
infringements, reproductions and/or colorable imitations of the BEATLES Marks and the
YELLOW SUBMARINE Mark (collectively “Plaintiffs’ Marks”). See id. at ¶ 16; Decl. of T.
Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez (Wiborg-Rodriguez Decl.), ECF No. [9-3] ¶ 2; Decl. of Kathleen Burns
(Burns Decl.), ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 4.
Although each Defendant may not copy and infringe each of Plaintiffs’ Marks for each
category of goods protected, Plaintiffs have submitted sufficient evidence showing that each
Defendant has infringed, at least, one or more of Plaintiffs’ Marks. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1]
¶¶ 4-5, 10-11, 16–20; ECF No. [9-2]. Defendants are not now, nor have they ever been, authorized
or licensed to use, reproduce, or make counterfeits, reproductions, or colorable imitations of
Plaintiffs’ Marks. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1] ¶¶ 16, 19-20.
Plaintiffs’ counsel retained Invisible Inc (“Invisible”), a licensed private investigative firm,
to investigate the promotion and sale of counterfeit and infringing versions of Plaintiffs’ branded
products by Defendants and to document the available payment account data for receipt of funds
paid to Defendants for the sale of counterfeit versions of Plaintiffs’ branded products. See Cole Decl.
ECF No. [9-1] ¶ 17; Wiborg-Rodriguez Decl., ECF No. [9-3] ¶ 2; Burns Decl., ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 3.
Invisible accessed the Internet based e-commerce stores operating under each Defendant’s E-
commerce Store Name,3 placed an order from each Defendant for the purchase of a product bearing
and/or using counterfeits of, at least, one of Plaintiffs’ Marks and requested a product from each
Defendant be billed and/or shipped to an address in the Southern District of Florida. See Burns
Decl., ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 4. Each order was processed entirely electronically and following the
3 Most of the orders from Defendants were not finalized so as to avoid adding money to Defendants’ coffers.
See Wiborg-Rodriguez Decl., ECF No. [9-3] ¶ 2 n.1; Burns Decl., ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 4 n.1.
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 4 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
5
submission of the orders, Invisible documented information for finalizing payment4 for the products
ordered on each of the Defendants’ e-commerce stores as identified on Schedule “A.” See Burns Decl.
ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 4, and ECF Nos. [9-5]-[9-11]; Wiborg-Rodriguez Decl., ECF No. [9-3] ¶ 2. At the
conclusion of the process, the detailed web pages of the various products bearing and/or using
Plaintiffs’ Marks offered for sale and ordered via Defendants’ E-commerce Store Names, were sent
to Plaintiffs’ representative for inspection. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-1] ¶ 18; Wiborg-Rodriguez
Decl., ECF No. [9-3] ¶ 2.
Plaintiffs’ representative reviewed and visually inspected the detailed web page captures
reflecting Plaintiffs’ branded goods offered for sale and ordered by Invisible and determined the
products were non-genuine, unauthorized versions of Plaintiffs’ goods. See Cole Decl., ECF No. [9-
1] ¶¶ 18–20; ECF No. [9-2].
On October 30, 2025, Plaintiffs filed its Complaint, ECF No. [1], and thereafter on
December 4, 2025, its Amended Complaint against Defendants for trademark counterfeiting and
infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and common law
trademark infringement, ECF No. [29]. On November 12, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their Ex Parte
Application for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order and Order Restraining Transfer of Assets,
ECF No. [9]. On November 17, 2025, this Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order and
temporarily restrained Defendants from infringing Plaintiffs’ Marks at issue. See ECF No. [14].
The Temporary Restraining Order also directed eBay Commerce, Inc. (“eBay”), Temu.com and
WhaleCo, Inc., which is a subsidiary of PDD Holdings, Inc., which operates the temu.com website
4 	Defendants 	have 	their 	payments 	processed 	on 	their 	behalf 	using 	money 	transfer 	and/or
retention/processing services via their marketplace platform’s designated payment processor. These
payment processors can use the information on Schedule “A” to tie an e-commerce store to a reported
transaction and identify the respective Defendant’s funds held in sub-accounts within their respective
aggregate account using the information identified herein. See Burns Decl., ECF No. [9-4] ¶ 4 n.2.
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 5 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
6
(“Temu”), Shein.com and Shein US Services LLC, which is a subsidiary of Shein.com (“Shein”),
to identify and restrain funds in payment accounts associated with Defendants and to divert those
funds to a holding account. Pursuant to the Court’s November 17, 2025 Order, Plaintiffs served
Defendants with a copy of the Complaint together with copies of the Ex Parte Application for
Entry of Temporary Restraining Order and Order Restraining Transfer of Assets, and the Court’s
November 17, 2025 Temporary Restraining Order, thereby providing notice and copies of the
November 17, 2025 Temporary Restraining Order and Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Entry
of Temporary Restraining Order and Order Restraining Transfer of Assets via email to each
Defendant’s corresponding email address and by posting copies of the Temporary Restraining
Order and all other pleadings and documents on file in this action on the website located at
http://servingnotice.com/anff16/index.html. 	Thereafter, 	Certificates 	of 	Service 	were 	filed
confirming service on each Defendant, ECF Nos. [25]-[26].
On November 26, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their Motion requesting the Court convert the
Temporary Restraining Order into a preliminary injunction and, upon filing, served Defendants
with the Motion as noted in the Certificate of Service annexed thereto. See ECF No. [27] at 18. On
December 1, 2025, the Court entered an Order Setting Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of
Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. [28]. Pursuant to the Court’s December 1, 2025, Order, Plaintiffs
served Defendants with a copy of the Order Setting Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of
Preliminary Injunction through the means specified in Paragraph 12 of the Temporary Restraining
Order. Thereafter, Certificates of Service were filed confirming service on each Defendant, ECF
Nos. [30]-[31].
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 6 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
7
II. 	LEGAL STANDARD
In order to obtain a preliminary injunction, a party must demonstrate “(1) [there is] a
substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) that irreparable injury will be suffered if the
relief is not granted; (3) that the threatened injury outweighs the harm the relief would inflict on
the non-movant; and (4) that the entry of the relief would serve the public interest.” Schiavo ex.
rel Schindler v. Schiavo, 403 F.3d 1223, 1225–26 (11th Cir. 2005).
III. 	DISCUSSION
The declarations Plaintiffs submitted in support of their Motion support the following
conclusions of law:
1. 	Plaintiffs have a strong probability of proving at trial that consumers are likely to
be confused by Defendants’ advertisement, promotion, sale, offer for sale, and/or distribution of
goods bearing and/or using counterfeits, reproductions, or colorable imitations of Plaintiffs’ Marks,
and that the products Defendants are selling and promoting for sale are copies of Plaintiffs’ products
that bear and/or use copies of Plaintiffs’ Marks.
2. 	Because of the infringement of Plaintiffs’ Marks, Plaintiffs are likely to suffer
immediate and irreparable injury if a preliminary injunction is not granted. It appears from the
following specific facts, as set forth in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, Motion, and accompanying
declarations on file, that immediate and irreparable loss, damage, and injury will result to Plaintiffs
and to consumers because it is more likely true than not that:
a. 	Defendants own or control Internet based e-commerce stores operating
under their E-commerce Store Names that advertise, promote, offer for sale, and sell products
bearing and/or using counterfeit and infringing trademarks in violation of Plaintiffs’ rights; and
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 7 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
8
b. 	There is good cause to believe that more counterfeit and infringing products
bearing and/or using Plaintiffs’ trademarks will appear in the marketplace; that consumers are
likely to be misled, confused, or disappointed by the quality of these products.
3. 	The balance of potential harm to the Defendants in restraining their trade in
counterfeit and infringing branded goods if a preliminary injunction is issued is far outweighed by
the potential harm to Plaintiffs, their reputations, and their goodwill as manufacturers and distributors
of quality products if such relief is not issued.
4. 	The public interest favors issuance of the preliminary injunction to protect Plaintiffs’
trademark interests and protect the public from being defrauded by the palming off of counterfeit
goods as Plaintiffs’ genuine goods.
5. 	Under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), Plaintiffs may be entitled to recover, as an equitable
remedy, the illegal profits gained through Defendants’ distribution and sales of goods bearing and/or
using counterfeits and infringements of Plaintiffs’ Marks. See Reebok Int’l, Ltd. v. Marnatech
Enters., Inc., 970 F.2d 552, 559 (9th Cir. 1992) (quoting Fuller Brush Prods. Co. v. Fuller Brush
Co., 299 F.2d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 1962) (“An accounting of profits under § 1117(a) is not synonymous
with an award of monetary damages: ‘[a]n accounting for profits . . . is an equitable remedy subject
to the principles of equity.’”)).
6. 	Requesting equitable relief “invokes the district court’s inherent equitable powers to
order preliminary relief, including an asset freeze, in order to assure the availability of permanent
relief.” Levi Strauss & Co., 51 F.3d 982, 987 (citing Federal Trade Commission v. United States
Oil & Gas Corp., 748 F.2d 1431, 1433-34 (11th Cir. 1984)).
7. 	Considering the inherently deceptive nature of the counterfeiting business, and the
likelihood that Defendants have violated federal trademark laws, Plaintiffs have good reason to
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 8 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
9
believe Defendants will hide or transfer their ill-gotten assets beyond the jurisdiction of this Court
unless those assets are restrained.
IV. 	CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116,
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and the Court’s inherent authority,
Plaintiffs’ Motion, ECF No. [27], is GRANTED as follows:
1. 	Each 	Defendant, 	its 	officers, 	directors, 	employees, 	agents, 	subsidiaries,
distributors, and all persons in active concert or participation with any Defendant having
notice of this Order are restrained and enjoined until further Order of this Court:
a. 	From manufacturing, importing, advertising, promoting, offering to sell,
selling, distributing, or transferring any products bearing and/or using Plaintiffs’
Marks, 	or 	any 	confusingly 	similar 	trademarks, 	other 	than 	those 	actually
manufactured or distributed by Plaintiffs; and
b. 	From secreting, concealing, destroying, selling off, transferring, or otherwise
disposing of: (i) any products, not manufactured or distributed by Plaintiffs, bearing
and/or using Plaintiffs’ Marks, or any confusingly similar trademarks; (ii) any
evidence relating to the manufacture, importation, sale, offer for sale, distribution,
or transfer of any products bearing and/or using Plaintiffs’ Marks, or any
confusingly similar trademarks; or (iii) any assets or other financial accounts
subject to this Order, including inventory assets, in the actual or constructive
possession of, or owned, controlled, or held by, or subject to access by, any
Defendant, including, but not limited to, any assets held by or on behalf of any
Defendant.
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 9 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
10
2. 	Each 	Defendant, 	its 	officers, 	directors, 	employees, 	agents, 	subsidiaries,
distributors, and all persons in active concert or participation with any Defendant having
notice of this Order shall immediately discontinue, until further order of this Court, the use
of Plaintiffs’ Marks or any confusingly similar trademarks, on or in connection with all e-
commerce stores owned and operated, or controlled by them, including the Internet based
e-commerce stores operating under the E-commerce Store Names;
3. 	Each 	Defendant, 	its 	officers, 	directors, 	employees, 	agents, 	subsidiaries,
distributors, and all persons in active concert or participation with any Defendant having
notice of this Order shall immediately discontinue, until further order of this court, the use
of Plaintiffs’ Marks, or any confusingly similar trademarks on e-commerce marketplace
platforms, within domain name extensions, metatags or other markers within website
source code, from use on any webpage (including as the title of any web page), from any
advertising links to other websites, from search engines’ databases or cache memory, and
any other form of use of such terms that are visible to a computer user or serves to direct
computer searches to e-commerce stores registered, owned, or operated by any Defendant,
including the Internet based e-commerce stores operating under the E-commerce Store
Names;
4. 	Each Defendant shall continue to preserve copies of all computer files relating to
the use of any of the E-commerce Store Names and shall take all steps necessary to retrieve
computer files relating to the use of the E-commerce Store Names that may have been
deleted before the entry of this Order;
5. 	Upon Plaintiffs’ request, the privacy protection service for any of the E-commerce
Store Names for which the registrant uses such privacy protection service to conceal the
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 10 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
11
registrant’s identity and contact information is ordered to disclose to Plaintiffs the true
identities and contact information of those registrants;
6. 	Upon receipt of notice of this Order, the Defendants and all financial institutions,
payment processors, banks, escrow services, money transmitters, or marketplace platforms,
including but not limited to, eBay, Temu, and Shein, and their related companies and
affiliates shall immediately, to the extent not already done, (i) identify all financial accounts
and/or sub-accounts, associated with the Internet based e-commerce stores operating under
the E-commerce Store Names, payment accounts, e-commerce store numbers, infringing
product numbers, transaction numbers or information, and/or the e-mail addresses
identified on Schedule “A” hereto, as well as any other related accounts of the same
customer(s); (ii) identify all other accounts which transfer funds into the same financial
institution account(s) or any of the other financial accounts subject to this Order; (iii)
restrain the transfer of all funds, as opposed to ongoing account activity, held or received
for their benefit or to be transferred into their respective financial accounts, and any other
financial accounts tied thereto; and (iv) divert those restrained funds to a holding account
for the trust of the Court;
7. 	Upon receipt of notice of this Order, Defendants and all financial institutions,
payment processors, banks, escrow services, money transmitters, or marketplace platforms,
including but not limited to, eBay, Temu and Shein, and their related companies and
affiliates, shall further, to the extent not already done, provide Plaintiffs’ counsel with all
data that details (i) an accounting of the total funds restrained and identify the financial
account(s) and sub-account(s) which the restrained funds are related to, and (ii) the account
transactions related to all funds transmitted into the financial account(s) and sub-account(s)
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 11 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
12
which have been restrained. No funds restrained by this Order shall be transferred or
surrendered by any financial institutions, payment processors, banks, escrow services,
money transmitters, or marketplace platforms, including but not limited to, eBay, Temu, and
Shein, and their related companies and affiliates for any purpose (other than pursuant to a
purchase refund chargeback made by a consumer) without the express authorization of this
Court;
8. 	This Order shall apply to the E-commerce Store Names, associated e-commerce
stores, and financial accounts, and any other e-commerce store names, or financial accounts
which are being used by Defendants for the purpose of counterfeiting Plaintiffs’ Marks
and/or unfairly competing with the Plaintiffs;
9. 	Any Defendant or financial institution account holder subject to this Order may
petition the Court to modify the asset restraint set out in this Order;
10. 	As a matter of law, this Order shall no longer apply to any Defendant or associated
e-commerce store dismissed from this action or as to which Plaintiffs have withdrawn their
request for a preliminary injunction;
11. 	Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(5)(D) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c),
Plaintiffs shall maintain their previously posted bond in the amount of Ten Thousand
Dollars and Zero Cents ($10,000.00), as payment of damages to which Defendants may be
entitled for a wrongful injunction or restraint, during the pendency of this action, or until
further Order of the Court. In the Court’s discretion, the bond may be subject to increase
should an application be made in the interest of justice;
12. 	Additionally, for the purpose of providing additional notice of this proceeding, and
all other pleadings, orders, and documents filed herein, the owners, operators and/or
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 12 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
13
administrators of the e-commerce stores, messaging services, and/or financial institutions,
payment 	processors, 	banks, 	escrow 	services, 	money 	transmitters, 	and 	marketplace
platforms, including but not limited to, eBay, Temu and Shein, and their related companies
and affiliates shall, to the extent not already done, at Plaintiffs’ request, provide Plaintiffs’
counsel with any e-mail address known to be associated with Defendants’ respective E-
commerce Store Names; and
13. 	This Order shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, or until further
Order of this Court.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on December 5, 2025.
__________________________________
BETH BLOOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of Record
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 13 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
14
SCHEDULE A:
DEFENDANTS BY NUMBER, E-COMMERCE STORE NAME,
FINANCIAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND E-MAIL ADDRESS
Def.
No.
Defendant / E-Commerce
Store name
Account Information:
Store No. / Store Name Product No.
1 	chnguy-8380 	chnguy-8380 	135124613066
2 	coolkiddo 	coolkiddo 	156672835778
3 	ghjdkdfj4 	ghjdkdfj4 	375767260866
4 	kronauth-39 	kronauth-39 	356102269349
5 	piki5961 	piki5961 	375854258986
6 	BDJADCHB 	634418220205852 	601101052859507
7 	Canyon Cotton 	634418224321115 	601102376732470
8 	Capstract 	634418219884530 	601100059780639
9 	Chuangyuanxuan 	634418223101348 	601103043188064
10 	Cosmic Clock Shop A local 	634418222090976 	601100807070359
11 	DNGP 	634418221044968 	601100806271232
12 	FIIICDFB 	634418221734687 	601100822793679
13 	FZJFJSRC 	634418221755163 	601102413802578
14 	GlobeMart A 	634418221149251 	601102432592724
15 	Hezhi Blanket 	634418221291782 	601100581863643
16 	HFFDSS 	634418220233655 	601100068522534
17 	hibiscus syriacus 	634418224755100 	601102376711186
18 	HIDOPR 	634418222745306 	601102227055444
19 	HLKCCA 	634418221389540 	601100827811834
20 	HLKLYYA 	634418221828270 	601100806816522
21 	HLKZHBB 	634418221807213 	601100818749221
22 	iF Mens studio 	634418219328963 601100825635211
601100826384895
23 	INAA local 	634418223085073 	601102947738279
24 	JLHDD 	634418221101131 	601101230778380
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 14 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
15
25 	JLHKD 	634418221153651 	601101233170479
26 	JSJHSFC 	634418223012382 	601102446849505
27 	KaftanX 	634418224014980 	601102488269489
28 	Kanea 	634418221299319 	601100828224137
29 	KJXABCOO 	634418222558282 	601100801626973
30 	LINGWEINA 	634418221347004 	601100954510394
31 	LJTST 	634418222758446 	601100832883933
32 	LunaBlend 	634418222159503 	601102424988674
33 	LuxeStitch 	634418221950021 	601102374275693
34 	Mens Trendy Gentleman 	634418223246762 	601102937982665
35 	mfdealha 	634418220190970 	601100054454397
36 	Mono Local 	634418224995072 	601103010848694
37 	MPVG 	634418221046327 	601100826779258
38 	NSHGWHGA 	634418224132229 	601102447507192
39 	OOTPOD 	634418221848227 	601100823997494
40 	OPWKELRI 	634418224369893 	601102444155214
41 	Peachie 	634418222551587 	601102599946214
42 	PENGTA 	634418222137615 	601100813707499
43 	Printify X 	634418221028379 	601102376866468
44 	QINGXINGYI 	634418221358264 	601100813909552
45 	QINGYINIAN 	634418221362383 	601100814659735
46 	Quanyangxia 	634418221370234 	601100828613317
47 	quekun 	634418221602809 	601100834635807
48 	RUIDONGDDD 	634418223316502 	601102479163166
49 	RWJGA 	634418223242728 	601102226941664
50 	Silhouette Studio 	634418222425435 	601100823016364
51 	SITUHA 	634418222771008 	601100831134570
52 	SN Wilson 	634418224701322 	601103096302079
53 	SQFEIGHT 	634418223682594 	601101392602846
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 15 of 16

Case No. 25-cv-25009-BLOOM/Elfenbein
16
54 	three qun 	634418218681017 	601102382758326
55 	Trendy Print Top Stop 	634418222534005 	601100803969386
56 	Unrest Goods 	634418224224670 	601102432533163
57 	UrbanThrengood 	634418224584232 	601102520169969
58 	Verve Local 	634418224286073 	601103075974316
59 	WOLANGNENG 	634418221172186 	601100150412976
60 	World Press 	634418225136283 	601102497024213
61 	XmTide 	634418222127499 	601103027968017
62 	yixuanbaihuodian 	634418222827688 	601100968661841
63 	ZW CHU SPACE 	634418220113648 	601100817047487
64 	Anzelong SHOP 	4261152347 	65088400
65 	Hongtao Shop 	5327973312 	74640439
66 	Streetwear Fashion 	4221929311 	69914103
Case 1:25-cv-25009-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 16 of 16